Joined up writing
Posted Monday into Writing by John Birmingham
When was the last time you picked up a pen or pencil and scratched out a line or two of handwriting? Not printing. Not blocky capital letters listing a handful of items you might need from the corner store. But long looping swirls and scratches and spikes and curlicues of flowing ink? Cursive writing. Joined up writing. Like grown-ups use.
Maybe it was only a few minutes ago. Maybe it was weeks. I'm ashamed to say that I can go weeks without putting pen to paper. But then I might go for weeks using my notebook – my actual Moleskin Notebook – every day.

There's a debate on at the moment – not a particularly fiery or engaging one, I'll concede – between the true believers in cursive, the running writing you learned about half way through primary school, and the unbelievers who think it's all just bullshit and people don't need it because... SCIENTZ! And, er, TECHNOLOLOGY!
Nobody's saying an adult doesn't need to know how to make their mark on a piece of paper, but some academics and keyboard jihadists and dictation fanatics don't think there is any point in preferencing handwriting.
Mashable has a nice round up of the argument over here.
Although I don't use it every day, I would be lost without the ability to write in longhand. Granted, nowadays when I take notes on the fly I mostly do so on my iPhone using either the keyboard or, if I'm in the car in particular, dictation. (There's a whole 'nother entry to be written about the limitations of Apple's dictation software, licensed from Nuance who provide the engine for the desktop system I use at home. But we won't get into that). Bottom line, you can use neither your thumbs nor a pencil when you're driving the car, but if you are willing to speak in a staccato Captain Kirk voice you-can-dictate-with-a-reasonable-degree-of-accuracy. Except that the iPhone would probably miss the translation of the words 'reasonable' and maybe 'accuracy'.
So why do I still write longhand? Because it's a great way of unblocking a stream of thought which has become hopelessly damned. It's also a really good way of laying out your thoughts when you haven't really... well... thought them through. When you are just playing with the ideas. Dictation is hopeless for this. Dictation software is now advanced enough that it much prefers a conversational flow of sound. If you have a whole paragraph formed in your head and can just let it all out without a break, the transcription is likely to be much more accurate than a bunch of phrases and half formed thoughts stuttered and stammered into the microphone.
There is nothing contemplative about dictation software. The need to dictate formatting and to wake up or pause the program interrupts any 'flow state'. Dictation, and to a lesser extent, typing, are less well suited to wool gathering than paper.
For a few years, until recently, I was on the lookout for a proper desk journal. Something with a surface area of an old desktop blotter. A3 page size at least. I eventually found one Berkelouw's secondhand bookstore Eumundi. (Dragon Dictatte's first pass at Eumunid was 'your Monday'). I think they may have ordered too many. I managed to pick up this massive tome – a Moleskin no less – for about the same price as I paid for the small moleskin notebook I keep in the back of my jeans pocket. It's now my "daybook".
At the start of each day I jot down a few notes about the tasks I have set myself to accomplish by the time the sun goes down. It's normally a short simple list. A blog, half a book chapter, maybe some admin. As I work through the tasks I tick 'em off. There's no reason for using a massive journal to record this sort of minutiae when a scrap of paper blue tacked to the screen of my iMac would do just as well. But into the daybook also goes chapter plans, book structures, character notes, the drawings of certain scenes such as the floor plan of the cell in which Prince Harry and Otto Skorzeny have their fight to the death. The datebook in its current incarnation contains 'zoological' notes about the various monsters in A Protocol for Monsters. There's a complete chapter breakdown for Stalin's Hammer: Cairo and a couple of thousand words worth of notes written down longhand in the old-fashioned way while I was reading extracts from a couple of Wilfrid Burchett books.
I haven't used the daybook in this way, but at some point if I ever write myself into a corner, I will inevitably turn a new page, pick up a pen, and ask myself the question "What the fuck am I trying to say here?" Without thinking through the answer, I then lay pen to paper and start writing as fast as possible. Doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense. It sure as hell won't be in anything approaching polished prose. But after I fill up half a page or so with closely spaced handwriting, whatever had caused me to stop typing or dictating will no longer be an issue. I will know what I'm trying to say and how to say it.

This doesn't mean some nine-year-old kid needs to maintain an author's daybook. But I can't help thinking that different areas of the brain are involved in forming and structuring and expressing our thoughts when we write them then when we type or dictate them. The latter I am qualified to comment on because as we've canvassed here previously, there is a real cognitive difference between dictating a story and writing it. It's a difference I've managed, I hope, to resolve over the years, but it's still there. I can feel it every time I sit down, or stand up to put my dictation headset on. It requires an act of will, of conscious effort, to set aside the very particular way of thinking that lies behind expressing yourself through spoken language as opposed to writing. And there are still certain forms of writing, usually the denser more intellectual or polished forms, for which I don't even bother turning on Dragon Dictate. I know it's better to type out the words or even to write them with pen and paper before transferring them to the screen later.
Is there a difference between typing and writing? They're both creating a neural link between the language centers of the brain and those parts involved in the control of fine motor skills. I would say that after twenty-five years of writing there isn't a difference. But I'd be lying or mistaken. Because if that was the case there would be no need for me to maintain the daybook sitting on the desk a few feet away from me now. And I would never have to pick up a pen and turn to a blank piece of paper to start writing out my thoughts longhand on those occasions where I suddenly found the thoughts resisting all efforts to put them on screen.
But anyway, I was really more interested in what other non-writerly people have to say about this. Do you still use the cursive script you learned in grade three or four at school, and would you be willing for your children or some theoretical future generation to do without it?







NBlob has opinions thus...
Posted Monday
@ work I need to take long hand comprehensive contemporaeneous notes. Sometimes 10's of pages. Usually just the spittle flecked ranting & hooting of a enraged moron, but in the interests of fairness, transperancy, accountability & stuff'nthat I need to record it. I have learnt from bitter experience that Digital Voice Recorders, tape recorders, triple deck recorders even video cameras ALWAYS fail at the worse possible moment. Thus while it causes many hand cramps and is frequently as legible as the scratchings of an epileptic apopleptic chicken, it is still admissable, aducable *rse covering.
Peter Bradley swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted Monday
Firstly in my bid for pedantic bastard of the day award...Moleskine not moleskin.
As far as notebooks go I have two. The one I take to all outside the office meetings. I write all meeting notes, pre and post meeting musings and asorted other things to prompt action or record events.
In the office I have the larger A4 notebook for more detailed musings. Could I do it on screen? Maybe but there is something about the process of putting it down on paper and considering what you have written that adds...not sure what or how but it just adds.
NBlob is gonna tell you...
Posted Monday
Your pedantry needs work
"Dragon Dictatte's first pass at Eumunid was 'your Monday')" Immediately after spelling Eumundi properly.
John Birmingham asserts...
Posted Monday
'asorted'?
'Dictatte'?
Hang your heads in shame and hand in your Pedant Badge, both of you.
NBlob reckons...
Posted Monday
Hey, my pedantry is purely recreational. And frequently undermined by m'y imprecice apostrophe use and grade 10 spellings..
Jigoku is gonna tell you...
Posted Monday
Might as well join in with the other SAGNs ...
"...expressing our thoughts when we write them then[sic] when we type or dictate them."
damian mumbles...
Posted Yesterday
Hey it's called recursive pedantry fail. It's the new meme.
John, you forgot to include a deliberate mitsake in your comment...
Lulu puts forth...
Posted Monday
My handwriting is some kind of unholy (& untidy) union between cursive and print, leaning more towards cursive. I write faster than I type, so if I'm working through ideas & trying to get them down quickly, it's always done by hand. And I make fewer mistakes.
Blarkon mutters...
Posted Monday
The thing about a great notebook - like those Duomos - is that it's such a beautiful notebook that I feel bad actually writing in it with my shitty handwriting.
Neal Stephenson writes the first draft of all his books longhand (there's even Neal Stephenson Fountain Pen geekery).
The handwriting recognition on MS tablets (which goes back to XP so it's been around a while) is very good at converting longhand - even my extremely shitty longhand. It's certainly faster than using an on-screen keyboard.
John Birmingham mumbles...
Posted Monday
Really? I'd have to see that to believe it.
Blarkon mumbles...
Posted Monday
Here you go - I youtubed it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxrMHybZhV4
robW reckons...
Posted 23 hours ago
I'm finishing up a software project that uses the Surface Pro (next get of this stuff) and the only reason I'm writing code for this expensive tablet/pc is because it does handwriting so well. Service people in the field (working in street construction) can use the pen to jot down the info needed to lock in the Geo coordinates with a description. Just say'n. . . .it does seem to work surprisingly well.
insomniac reckons...
Posted Monday
If i wrote in cursive it would look exactly like it did just prior to me stopping doing so at about age 11 or so: diabolical and childlike. I tend to print with letters that run together more so than joined up. I don't often write long pieces on paper unless I really want a personal touch such as when I wrote to my children after their grandfather died and they couldn't attend because they are scattered to the wind across the country. If I do write longer pieces I try and write more clearly than when I'm noting things down for myself, which is more like a scribble.
Dino not to be confused with is gonna tell you...
Posted Monday
JB,
Handwriting has more nuance than Typewriting.
I lost a diary in 1997 with 'lots' of stuff in it.
Trying to remember it all is near on impossible.
It's only a small fraction of my lifetime.
Or is that an infraction?
Anyhoo it's not in my possession and the years go rolling on.
If I had put it in electronica or da interweb it wouldn't be private anymore.
WarDog swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted Monday
Writing/typing - no difference sans muscle memory. If you need to speed up or slow down you can do it in either. I use both but nowadays treat any written material as immediately binnable because
The pros for the written form are that it uses a low tech solution for times when a high tech one is not available. It can use some tools that are more portable, though this is starting to become less of a distinction (I use my Nexus7 and Swype to capture most notes now about as fast as I can type, notes which are then persisted in the cloud and available on all my other devices).
As to cursive, it'll always be there when you want it http://www.fontspace.com/category/cursive
Murphy would have you know...
Posted Monday
Printed form is not vulnerable to power failures, corrupted drives, and obsolete code. If you don't believe me, try to extract something off of your 3.5 floppy.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
Greybeard reckons...
Posted Monday
I have a USB 3.5" floppy drive for that purpose. Somewhere there's a 5.25" but most MoBos don't have the right connection for that any more. Still, out in the shed there just might be one still working. Also have a working VCR for those daggy old weddding videos people decide to convert - about 10 years after they've turned to static.
Dick mumbles...
Posted Monday
Hey Greybeard, where's your 8" drive?
Dino not to be confused with puts forth...
Posted Monday
Dick,
It's floppy.
My 3 and a half inch is solid though!
Solid state mate!
WarDog mumbles...
Posted 24 hours ago
Murph/Greybeard - cloud. Anything local is only a local cache running on impermanent hardware. Anything of value on my old 5.25" floppies, yes Murph I remember those times before the 3.5" (I still have some 3.5" and 5.25" as art deco pieces), has long been migrated into more permanent stores.
And Murph power too cached be cached. Some of us have been using batteries for about 2 millenia.
Timmo has opinions thus...
Posted Monday
I tend to write in scruffy printing (with the occasional curlicue on g, y and f) that runs together somewhat.
I'm still in the old school at uni, writing notes in books rather than on laptops. It would be an interesting thing to see how many postgrad students use laptops compared to undergrads. From the back of the class it would be interesting to see how many are websurfing or using facebook instead (I've seen it on several occasions even in postgrad classes).
Laptops or typed text would make it easier when it comes timing to pulling it together for study etc, but I haven't yet got to listening and typing as easily as writing. I do occasionally use voice recording on the phone to track ideas, but not to dictation software.
w from brisbane asserts...
Posted Monday
Minor point: If you never learnt to write, it would be hard to have a signature.
It is still used in instruction, particularly in languages e,g. french, mathematics, chemistry, computer languages. Someone asked a question, seems natural to go to a whiteboard and quickly write some examples.
Still used in meetings when you are workshopping something. What are the things we need to be thinking about with this project? People start writing stuff on the board. It is how a group thinks out loud.
A good field scientist will always have paper and pencils, as backup. They are the relatively failsafe field recording system.
And most importantly, how else would we know the blackboard specials at the cafe or the pub?
WarDog asserts...
Posted Monday
"Minor point: If you never learnt to write, it would be hard to have a signature."
Digital. 256 bit
"seems natural to go to a whiteboard"
"People start writing stuff on the board. It is how a group thinks out loud."
Digital. Last 3 meetings I have had more than one of the participants was remote. We all communcated via the one Google doc real time. Could modify and annotate independently with tracking, commenting, archived side discussions with resolutions. It also makes it easier to embed links to back up claims and suggestions.
"how else would we know the blackboard specials"
Smart phone notification as you enter the joint. Something that remembers your preferences and highlights/sorts/filters the offerings for you.
w from brisbane would have you know...
Posted Monday
All good points Wardog. Yes, there are electronic options.
Re: your Google doc.
But, if you were all in the same room, you might also use the whiteboard. And the thinky would be different, I reckon.
Blackboard specials & smart phone notification. It is nice to look at a blackboard, your group gathered round. There could be computer screens now, however, the blackboard remains popular. Why? The tech must be good. And no need for wifi.
And what about graffiti? I don't want to be printing everything.
WarDog swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted 24 hours ago
Yes the thinky is slightly different. Better IMHO, multi-threaded as more than one person can be working on parts of a document at the same time whereas using a physical whiteboard has physical space constraints.
Re cafe speacials. My local now uses flat screens to display the specials. It';s pretty low tech all things considered and let's them stream other content such as the news and origin games, blackboards tend to struggle with that.
Grafitti? Printing? Sorry you lost me. You want to produce or consume grafitti? And then you want to print it? I have a digital collection of entertaining physical grafitti I have encountered. There are programs that allow you to digital grafit in their digital spaces, often mapped to the real world. You cna cloud print. Sorry just throwing things out there 'cause I'm not sure what you are after.
w from brisbane asserts...
Posted 23 hours ago
Re: the thinky would be different. With a whiteboard, people pause, they lean back, the fingers are laced behind the head, only one person has the whiteboard marker. Sometimes a period of slow thinking, like slow cooking, can produce a richer result.
Grafitti, that was a little joke. Me, with my big nikko pen, wanting options as a time-pressured graffitist.
yankeedog ducks in to say...
Posted Monday
Actually, once in a while I use the ol' longhand cursive, but more often than not I print, and it goes back to when I started drafting. See, kids, way back then people actually lettered the drawings, and all this was done by hand. Got so used to printing on drawings every day that it became second nature to print pretty much everything.
An analogy for my trade would be (despite having 3D CAD modeling software) sketching out things on a sheet of paper. There are times I do that before modeling up a part, which is kind of bass-ackwards-but it seems to work for me.
Murphy puts forth...
Posted Monday
Sadly or not, I lost what little ability I had to write in script years ago. On the other hand, I have retained the ability to write in print form (block letters, non cursive, whatever you want to call it). I can read it easily enough and more to the point, I can write at sufficient speed to get a fair bit of work down.
How much work?
Both of my professional level published stories, Tearing Down Tuesday and The Limb Knitter, were originally written in longhand form while I was working at my security guard job. Rewrites were conducted in the same fashion, though generally more targeted in nature.
In my other job at Birmo's military consultant, I use longhand to block out combat scenes in need of revision, scribble out those bits of local color that folks really like and fiddle with descriptive elements.
In terms of churning out sheer word count, an old school style clickety keyboard works best in creating quantity, but if I want quality, I use longhand.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
pitpat is gonna tell you...
Posted Monday
My cursive is crap but is still faster than my typing. I tend to end up with a crazy mix of print and cursive which can be a bit of a bitch for third parties to decipher when doing the data entry. I've had jobs in some mines which date back to the late 19th century ( Mt Lyell in particular) and reading the old field logs of the time was an absolute pleasure. The penmanship and the quirky detail is not seen today.
As W notes in the field a good notebook ( Chartwell survey books -currently uisng the 2647 with graph paper on one side and double spaced lines on the other) and a couple of good pencils are still the way to go. I've tried a couple of different tablet configurations but they seem time consuming, a bit limiting and a pain for sunlight readability.
Andrew Dugdell reckons...
Posted Monday
I tried to go all digital, but it nearly broke my soul and my wallet; I tried all the gizmos and gadgets. These days I file everything digital, but I take fsckloads of handwritten notes on mostly legal/junior legal notepads - there is just something that a scribble or a doodle on paper that at some level can't be captured with digital. But once I've finished I tear the pages out scan them with my nifty little scanner and bin them. ...sometimes I even make little explosion sounds as I hurl them across the room into the bin.
John Birmingham mutters...
Posted Monday
I keep meaning to scan my notebooks but, you know...
Dino not to be confused with mutters...
Posted Monday
Gotta get me one of doz nifty pens!
Ders books dat can raed too!
Blarkon reckons...
Posted Monday
Use the camera on your iPad to pull the pictures into Evernote. If you've got an Evernote subscription, it'll often do a servisable OCR on the text if the photograph is reasonable enough. That way your notes are also indexed.
Surtac reckons...
Posted Monday
Fascinating topic. As well as being a long time reader and book collector I’ve always been a bit of a stationery fetishist – an interesting pen and a well turned notebook will always get my attention.
I don’t do as much handwriting these days as I used to, but it’s still indispensable in my work situation. Most of my work output is expected to be in various document types (or artefacts as we call them in the enterprise architecture trade) – Word documents, Visio diagrams, pretty pictures etc. all designed to show relationships and inter-reactions between architectural elements and layers. There’s not that much narrative or creative text generation – it’s all descriptions of current state, desired future states, industry trends, transition roadmaps and such-like. This whole environment is too reactive for anything like even your daily planner, John. It’s all about lurching from ‘crisis’ to ‘crisis’ here.
But for documenting meetings or simply taking personal aide-memoire notes, I’ll do it by hand in a bound A4 notebook, detailing meeting time, subject, attendees, agreed actions and so on, along with anything else I feel like documenting. And it means I can doodle or start doing my own thing in my head if the meeting can’t hold my attention.
I can always write longhand much faster than I can type – the result is often unreadable, but it helps me get ideas out of my head faster as they compete to get out or run into one another. The simple act of writing things down forces me to do a better job of remembering stuff in the first place.
On the personal side, I maintain two or more notebooks. One is for lists of stuff I want to remember – wines I want to try again; music albums or dvd movies to look for on that next trip to JB HiFi; things I write down to remember now, before I forget to. That one generally lives in a shirt pocket. It’s the Cahier version of your small Moleskine and I actually have several of them, seeded around in various bags/organisers so I’m always likely to have one to hand with a spare pen and pencil when I need to record something.
The other is the next larger version of your small Moleskine set up to use as an Ideas Marathon, ie. To try to document thoughts and ideas as they occur daily. I’ve not been so successful with that one as it lives in my work backpack and is a bit too big for a pocket carry - I might have to physically downsize it to another Cahier or a smaller Moleskine.
tqft ducks in to say...
Posted Monday
All you people writing on paper are obviously jihadi cyber terrorists intent on keeping the government out of your evil evil thoughts.
My hand writing is crap. Like really bad. I could probably write something cursive if I had to. What's the non-joined up type of hand writing called? legibile but barely and used sparingly mostly for notes on printed working documents or on a whiteboard.
My signature is sort of legible for my name. But good luck anyone copying it.
Jigoku has opinions thus...
Posted Monday
Purely assumptively, I would suggest that the fine motor skills involved in typing would differ greatly to those used when writing and so use different neural pathways to achieve the same end, expressing thoughts in words.
Perhaps also the ability to change the structure of our current thought when typing prevents the further flow of it. I know I spend so much time getting each sentence "right" when typing that I lose my train of thought. When writing I would take more of a "I'll come back and reword it later" approach, where required.
As to whether I still use cursive, rarely. I personally don't have a need for it. I've even noticed that when I need to sign for a delivery or on a receipt it is very jittery and I have to think about how the letters are formed. Other times I'll start scrawling something, notice it is near illegible and either print it or open up Notepad++.
It probably still needs to be taught for a generation or two though, so kids can read their letters from Grandma, assuming she isn't already on Facebook ...
w from brisbane mutters...
Posted Monday
A facility with cursive script is essential if you want your little darlings to achieve the job of their dreams.
i.e. becoming a tattooist.
Brother PorkChop reckons...
Posted Monday
I am embarassed by my handwriting - a sad mix of cursive and something else. My 8 year od boy has nicer handwriting than me, and I certainly insist on the kids having proper handwriting. I am OK on a whiteboard, with diagrams, arrows and single words but pen and paper sentences are awesomely embarassing. Forget writing greeting cards!!
Ministry of the Interior asserts...
Posted Monday
MarkM reckons...
Posted Monday
I can touch type at about 80 words per minute. I know I can't write that fast. Nothing beats sitting in front of the keyboard, pounding away my thoughts as quick as I can think them. This said, I like to write poetry long hand - there is something about having the pen poised while mulling over the right word.
she_jedi mumbles...
Posted Monday
My mum is a registered nurse and she's maintained for years that I should have been a doctor with my handwriting; the medical profession apparently being the only one where an illegible scrawl is a requirement.
Sadly I squandered the opportunity to have the mutant hybrid of printing and cursive that spews from the end of my pen professionally sanctioned and became a business analyst instead. For that sin I've had to learn to write legibly on a whiteboard, which, when your natural state is hieroglyphical chicken scratch, is HARD. My natural writing is so bad that sometimes ?I can't read it.
The whiteboard is invaluable though; every time I'm in a meeting or workshop where the vaguest hint of requirements gathering is needed I find myself bounding to the whiteboard to start scribbling as legibly as possible and start the thinky. I have colleagues who take bets on how long it'll take for me to hit the whiteboard. Every business analyst I know has a pathological need to whiteboard stuff, it's a professional hazard.
I find I type much faster than I write, and because I do so much writing for work and for study outside of work, I very rarely find myself needing to scribble long hand in order to get the creative juices flowing. Although when I'm writing a requirements document I find I get inspiration/motivation from any notes I've scribbled down, or the stuff I've done on the whiteboard with the group.
Next time I get stuck with an essay for uni I'll try the scribbling in long hand trick and see if that helps; I think my biggest problem in that respect is that my urge to procrastinate dampens my creativity. Suddenly things like housework become vitally important when an assignment is due, even though prior to the deadline I would be content living like a 20 year old male uni student, and happy to procrastinate on cleaning. Go figure.
Barnesm mutters...
Posted Monday
"When was the last time you picked up a pen or pencil and scratched out a line or two of handwriting?
as part of investigations I use a field notebook to jot down 'contemporaneous notes' which are a lot more believeable when you are on the stand in a court than a beautifully formated typed affidiavit.
Personally I think these are mearly different tools, the actual body of words you write are just another way of creating the story in anohters head, if that is the intent of your writing. Your writing it long hand 'uses different parts of the brain' is no doubt true, but the same principle would apply if you wrote it using a harp to pray notes that correspond to letters, the points is you use whatever too you grew up with.
Could Shakespear have written as well if he was given dragon dictation, probably not but by the same token the next great writer growing up today will probably look at you funny when 50 years from now you suggest using the new I-brainwave to write instead of his computer.
Dino not to be confused with has opinions thus...
Posted Monday
Anyhoo I asked The Ejamucation Minister a question between 4 and 5 pm today.
No Response.
We'll keep 'really quiet 'bout dem rabbits'.
Some of da kids are calling him Daffy Duck!
damian puts forth...
Posted Monday
Cursive? I imagine people who try to read my handwriting might be a bit cursive. Somewhere between the South Australia, Queensland and Victorian primary school systems I learned, relearned a different way, then had to start again, all of which has left a shorthandish printing style with the occasional gothic touch. Oddly if I try to do running writing it ends up a lot neater, a function of going back to grade 5 I suppose which is probably the last time I used it.
But that doesn't stop me from buying nice notebooks and filling them with my hideous scratchings. The little moleskine things that you will confuse with your passport, carry one of those everywhere, lasts about a month. Usually just random notes, but the ambition is that a longer effort might start there one day.
Mind you I get a bit retro with marks on paper. I quite like the idea of bashing out a few hundred pages on the wonderful little Imperial manual typewriter (late 40s I think) that I picked up for practically nothing at the Rocklea flea markets a few years back.
RobertL swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted Monday
Durand has opinions thus...
Posted Monday
JB, what you need is a Livescribe Smartpen. Inside the pen is a tiny camera that can see what you're writing. You use special paper with printed micro-dots, so small that only the camera can read what they say. And by using both, the pen is able to render the page as a PDF, that can be saved to Evernote, and is thus available on all your devices.
Better yet, there is an onboard microphone that records what is being said at the time you're writing. You play back the recording by touching the pen to the paper, and it starts playing back what was being said while your pen was writing that note.
http://www.livescribe.com/en-us/
John Birmingham reckons...
Posted Yesterday
Ah, cheers. I was trying to think of this today.
damian swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted Yesterday
Been curious about those things since seeing one on display in Orificeworks. They seem a touch expensive for what they are, and in particular given that you need to keep buying special paper for it to make it work.
The handwriting recognition on Android seems fast and I would think no less accurate. I think we're not far from the fondleslabs all doing this trick pretty nicely.
Blarkon asserts...
Posted 21 hours ago
They already do - see my above posted youtube showing handwriting recognition of my really shit handwriting on the Surface. The way that MS managed to get this technology to work pretty well involved them about a decade ago buying up some massive collections of different handwriting styles and using those as the basis of building recognition. I've found Steve Jobs aversion to the stylus to be interesting as it precludes that sort of recognition being *directly* supported on Apple devices.
Moleskine has a special "Evernote Edition" - the special paper is already there and evernote has routines to automatically scan and OCR it. http://evernote.com/moleskine/
Aeryn asserts...
Posted Yesterday
I still write in longhand. It comes in handy at TAFE for making notes during class, and I don't always carry my laptop or iPad when I'm out and about - if I get a snippet of an idea for my novel in my head while I'm away from home, I can just jot it down in the notebook I always have with me. My handwriting is a cross between print and cursive, though at this point it's predominantly cursive - it works for me, and other people can read it, so I see no reason to change it.
Carrick lad mumbles...
Posted Yesterday
Thanks JB. This bit of thinky from the excellent Gillian Tett in the FT got me thinking about this earlier this year - http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/e27e8b6e-5abb-11e2-bc93-00144feab49a.html#axzz2WTEkuPpX.
As a transactional lawyer, most of my heavy duty drafing is done straight into a document on a screen in MSWord - only efficient way to do it. Some colleagues still mark up a document by hand and give it to a WP operator but I don't see the point - my near illegible scrawl doesn't help.
On dictation, we outsource this to our centre in Manila - given my thick Irish accent, I've never tried it although I'm morbidly curious to see what would come back. Digital dictation software hasn't been brought in yet as (certainly for transactional lawyers) it's a marginal form of work output. Most correspondence nowadays is on e-mail and this is very much DIY.
However, if I want to think and something out, blank bit of paper and a pen is where I start - haven't found a technology solution as effective (yet). Digital post-its rock though.
John Birmingham swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted Yesterday
Yeah, my wife is a lawer, and she does a heap of screentime every day but her fingers are still ink stained.
CathieT mumbles...
Posted Yesterday
Cursive? Only when I'm taking meeting minutes - makes it easier to write faster! I'd be the only one who could read it though, and at times even I have trouble.
My printing is very, very neat when it has to be - a year of handwriting accounts for a doctor's surgery saw to that.
Son and heir's school has decreed that all the Year 8s work from iPads this year, with only their music manuscript and Japanese workbooks being pen to paper. He was struggling with some stuff the other night until I showed him how much sense it made to scrawl it out on ye olde scrap paper!!
Oh and in a strange twist, I have two fonts on my computer that are my handwriting - print and cursive!!
w from brisbane is gonna tell you...
Posted Yesterday
Re: music manuscripts
On the separate topic of sheet music.
I heard, with the band for the musical King Kong, the musicians all have the sheet music on Ipads and the conductor turns the everyone's page with a wifi foot pedal.
I think they said it was a world first.
April K has opinions thus...
Posted Yesterday
I'm currently in the thankless and often lack-luster process of writing my PhD and if it wasn't for a notebook and pen, I doubt it would ever have even started! When I'm in the zone and have direction and know my argument, I can smash out 120words an hour on my funky bew Mac Air but if I didn't have the opportunity to scribble through and that blank open page to deal with my mismatched arguments and differing opinions, I'd be nowhere!
That said, I also use longhand to take notes if I'm at a conference as I find it helps me concentrate on the speaker (even if I'm bored). I watch uni undergrads on their laptops and wonder how much they are getting out of classes when they are chatting to the person across the room on Facebook.
John Birmingham mumbles...
Posted Yesterday
Answer: they're not getting much
Murphy would have you know...
Posted Yesterday
The students who are using tech gear are usually doing everything but paying attention to the material. And they almost always fail the course.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
AliCrampHand mutters...
Posted Yesterday
robW ducks in to say...
Posted 23 hours ago
As a young teen way back in 1965 I read "The Fury Out of Time" by Lloyd Biggle. I remember in his novel he posited that in the way-way-forward-future our descendants lose the ability to 'read' and "write" per se, but maintain the ability to manipulate images and iconography on screens with hand motions (he preceeds Apple's patents on multitouch by 30 years).
Maybe in the future we will all write like the Italians of today communicate: we will shout at hidden microphones while waving our hands around and making eye-contact with some attractive person in the room totally removed from the conversation.
Cursive will require a rosetta stone of some sort or another.
Ginger Megs mumbles...
Posted 21 hours ago
I'm a mature-age post-grad student, and I cannot produce any work of any worth unless I first play with the words on paper. This means I have notebooks and notepads chokka-blok full of ideas and partial sentences. I need to hand write everything, and the stuff I produce this way is generally not bad. What I find frustrating is the push from my supervisors to ditch the pen and type my thoughts directly into the computer. I think this is because my way is slower than they would like, but my thoughts and ideas cannot take their proper form unless they move from my fingers to paper and are shaped by me physically moving a pen. It doesn't need to be a 'proper' pen - an el cheapo plastic gel pen is best as it flows easily. There is a little romance in filling a page with my words. I see my much younger post-grad peers constantly pecking at their laptops and notebooks and tablets, and wonder if they find the joy and satisfaction in the plastic keys that I find with my plastic pen and newsagent school exercise books.
Dino not to be confused with mumbles...
Posted 21 hours ago
JB
As an aside-
You is getting some amazing traffic today!
Do da hokey pokey!
Will swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted 21 hours ago
When my kids were taught to write joined-up at primary school, I became so ashamed of my post-college handwriting that I took classes and practised caligraphy for 10 years. The result is that now, decades later, I still love to pick up a pen, any pen, at the least excuse. Most of the above comments totally ignore the pleasure of forming or reading beautiful letters. The world is the poorer for it.
she_jedi would have you know...
Posted 19 hours ago
My grandfather had the most beautiful copperplate handwriting. I despair whenever I think of the way he would write vs the horrific mutant chicken scratch I come up with. I think calligraphy classes would be awesome, I might look into those as the next project after I finish my ancient history degree. It would be lovely to learn to not only handwrite properly but beautifully.
Vanessa mumbles...
Posted 20 hours ago
I wish I could print... then maybe other people could read my writing!
nikx swirls their brandy and claims...
Posted 17 hours ago
my son has hi-functioning autism and one obstacle he meets in (mainstream) primary school is to focus on the technique of handwriting, spelling and at the same time producing content. he has excellent spelling, and lots to say, but all together will not come out easily. the teachers and special needs staff have been using ipad and typing, saying "he won't need handwriting much in the future, who does really?". I have now explicitly asked to use typing only occasionally. I want him to train the automatism of writing more (i am also doing some at home). it's essential excercise for the brain. it doesn't matter if 'we don't need it anymore' (really?). he is getting there, slowly, he can type anyway already better than his peers. I believe it's like learning a foreign language in school. the point isn't really if or when you will use it. it's the learning progress that is formative for your brain.
in my son's case, it's harder, but i think it would be a mistake to just give up, because : computers..
Jane mumbles...
Posted 14 hours ago
There something deeply satisfying about filling a page with script, of using a pen until the ink runs out. Of writing so fast (but not too fast) that an idea emerges and at other times writing slowly and savouring the form of every letter. I dunno. Maybe I've been scarred by watching The Pillowbook and inspired by reading Shadow of the Wind, but I love script. Not type.
Steve enters the fray asserts...
Posted 13 hours ago
Oddly enough in days long gone, when I was first an IT man (you know, before it was cool to be nerdy) working on Mainframes I did all my doc in long hand, and a bunch of typists typed it up for me. When I got my first PC with good old MS Word, I was stumped. Sure I could write COBOL and SQL straight from a (hand written) design, but words and actual human communication? No way!! So I did the doc long hand and typped it in. How times have changed. I have trouble putting a sentence together with a pencil in my hand these days, but thoughts flow through a keyboard no problem. I love that I can learn things.
Anthony mutters...
Posted 10 hours ago
Ah, the joys of filling in the little boxes on the forms and sending them away to be punched into cards by teams of nubile young women. And getting them back, waiting for the cards to go through the compiler and the compile failing because the writing was misread by said nubile young women.
My cursive is awful but I can still print pretty well.
YB mumbles...
Posted 8 hours ago
Pure blazing speed of creation: Type straight into MS Notepad, no editing
Make raw text into a formated, correctly spelled and formated document: MS Word or gmail inbuilt editor.
A personal note to someone important: Cursive
A note where the information is critical, or forms: Printing (Block)
To make something beautiful: I do calligraphy (1460's Germanic mainly)
Trashman mumbles...
Posted 7 hours ago
Any thoughts on doing a Blunty on the ADF Cheif's speech about the cutbacks?
A serving General willing to put his head above the parapet is a rarity!