Cheeseburger Gothic

Joined up writing

Posted Monday into Writing by John Birmingham

When was the last time you picked up a pen or pencil and scratched out a line or two of handwriting? Not printing. Not blocky capital letters listing a handful of items you might need from the corner store. But long looping swirls and scratches and spikes and curlicues of flowing ink? Cursive writing. Joined up writing. Like grown-ups use.
Maybe it was only a few minutes ago. Maybe it was weeks. I'm ashamed to say that I can go weeks without putting pen to paper. But then I might go for weeks using my notebook – my actual Moleskin Notebook – every day.

Daybook and notebook.

There's a debate on at the moment – not a particularly fiery or engaging one, I'll concede – between the true believers in cursive, the running writing you learned about half way through primary school, and the unbelievers who think it's all just bullshit and people don't need it because... SCIENTZ! And, er, TECHNOLOLOGY!

Nobody's saying an adult doesn't need to know how to make their mark on a piece of paper, but some academics and keyboard jihadists and dictation fanatics don't think there is any point in preferencing handwriting.

Mashable has a nice round up of the argument over here.

Although I don't use it every day, I would be lost without the ability to write in longhand. Granted, nowadays when I take notes on the fly I mostly do so on my iPhone using either the keyboard or, if I'm in the car in particular, dictation. (There's a whole 'nother entry to be written about the limitations of Apple's dictation software, licensed from Nuance who provide the engine for the desktop system I use at home. But we won't get into that). Bottom line, you can use neither your thumbs nor a pencil when you're driving the car, but if you are willing to speak in a staccato Captain Kirk voice you-can-dictate-with-a-reasonable-degree-of-accuracy. Except that the iPhone would probably miss the translation of the words 'reasonable' and maybe 'accuracy'.

So why do I still write longhand? Because it's a great way of unblocking a stream of thought which has become hopelessly damned. It's also a really good way of laying out your thoughts when you haven't really... well... thought them through. When you are just playing with the ideas. Dictation is hopeless for this. Dictation software is now advanced enough that it much prefers a conversational flow of sound. If you have a whole paragraph formed in your head and can just let it all out without a break, the transcription is likely to be much more accurate than a bunch of phrases and half formed thoughts stuttered and stammered into the microphone.

There is nothing contemplative about dictation software. The need to dictate formatting and to wake up or pause the program interrupts any 'flow state'. Dictation, and to a lesser extent, typing, are less well suited to wool gathering than paper.

For a few years, until recently, I was on the lookout for a proper desk journal. Something with a surface area of an old desktop blotter. A3 page size at least. I eventually found one Berkelouw's secondhand bookstore Eumundi. (Dragon Dictatte's first pass at Eumunid was 'your Monday'). I think they may have ordered too many. I managed to pick up this massive tome – a Moleskin no less – for about the same price as I paid for the small moleskin notebook I keep in the back of my jeans pocket. It's now my "daybook".

At the start of each day I jot down a few notes about the tasks I have set myself to accomplish by the time the sun goes down. It's normally a short simple list. A blog, half a book chapter, maybe some admin. As I work through the tasks I tick 'em off. There's no reason for using a massive journal to record this sort of minutiae when a scrap of paper blue tacked to the screen of my iMac would do just as well. But into the daybook also goes chapter plans, book structures, character notes, the drawings of certain scenes such as the floor plan of the cell in which Prince Harry and Otto Skorzeny have their fight to the death. The datebook in its current incarnation contains 'zoological' notes about the various monsters in A Protocol for Monsters. There's a complete chapter breakdown for Stalin's Hammer: Cairo and a couple of thousand words worth of notes written down longhand in the old-fashioned way while I was reading extracts from a couple of Wilfrid Burchett books.

I haven't used the daybook in this way, but at some point if I ever write myself into a corner, I will inevitably turn a new page, pick up a pen, and ask myself the question "What the fuck am I trying to say here?" Without thinking through the answer, I then lay pen to paper and start writing as fast as possible. Doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense. It sure as hell won't be in anything approaching polished prose. But after I fill up half a page or so with closely spaced handwriting, whatever had caused me to stop typing or dictating will no longer be an issue. I will know what I'm trying to say and how to say it.

This doesn't mean some nine-year-old kid needs to maintain an author's daybook. But I can't help thinking that different areas of the brain are involved in forming and structuring and expressing our thoughts when we write them then when we type or dictate them. The latter I am qualified to comment on because as we've canvassed here previously, there is a real cognitive difference between dictating a story and writing it. It's a difference I've managed, I hope, to resolve over the years, but it's still there. I can feel it every time I sit down, or stand up to put my dictation headset on. It requires an act of will, of conscious effort, to set aside the very particular way of thinking that lies behind expressing yourself through spoken language as opposed to writing. And there are still certain forms of writing, usually the denser more intellectual or polished forms, for which I don't even bother turning on Dragon Dictate. I know it's better to type out the words or even to write them with pen and paper before transferring them to the screen later.

Is there a difference between typing and writing? They're both creating a neural link between the language centers of the brain and those parts involved in the control of fine motor skills. I would say that after twenty-five years of writing there isn't a difference. But I'd be lying or mistaken. Because if that was the case there would be no need for me to maintain the daybook sitting on the desk a few feet away from me now. And I would never have to pick up a pen and turn to a blank piece of paper to start writing out my thoughts longhand on those occasions where I suddenly found the thoughts resisting all efforts to put them on screen.

But anyway, I was really more interested in what other non-writerly people have to say about this. Do you still use the cursive script you learned in grade three or four at school, and would you be willing for your children or some theoretical future generation to do without it?

70 Responses to ‘Joined up writing’

NBlob has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

@ work I need to take long hand comprehensive contemporaeneous notes. Sometimes 10's of pages. Usually just the spittle flecked ranting & hooting of a enraged moron, but in the interests of fairness, transperancy, accountability & stuff'nthat I need to record it. I have learnt from bitter experience that Digital Voice Recorders, tape recorders, triple deck recorders even video cameras ALWAYS fail at the worse possible moment. Thus while it causes many hand cramps and is frequently as legible as the scratchings of an epileptic apopleptic chicken, it is still admissable, aducable *rse covering.

Respond to this comment

Peter Bradley swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Monday

Firstly in my bid for pedantic bastard of the day award...Moleskine not moleskin.

As far as notebooks go I have two. The one I take to all outside the office meetings. I write all meeting notes, pre and post meeting musings and asorted other things to prompt action or record events.

In the office I have the larger A4 notebook for more detailed musings. Could I do it on screen? Maybe but there is something about the process of putting it down on paper and considering what you have written that adds...not sure what or how but it just adds.

NBlob is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

Your pedantry needs work

"Dragon Dictatte's first pass at Eumunid was 'your Monday')" Immediately after spelling Eumundi properly.

John Birmingham asserts...

Posted Monday

'asorted'?

'Dictatte'?

Hang your heads in shame and hand in your Pedant Badge, both of you.

NBlob reckons...

Posted Monday

Hey, my pedantry is purely recreational. And frequently undermined by m'y imprecice apostrophe use and grade 10 spellings..

Jigoku is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

Might as well join in with the other SAGNs ...

"...expressing our thoughts when we write them then[sic] when we type or dictate them."

damian mumbles...

Posted Yesterday

Hey it's called recursive pedantry fail. It's the new meme.

John, you forgot to include a deliberate mitsake in your comment...

Respond to this thread

Lulu puts forth...

Posted Monday

My handwriting is some kind of unholy (& untidy) union between cursive and print, leaning more towards cursive. I write faster than I type, so if I'm working through ideas & trying to get them down quickly, it's always done by hand. And I make fewer mistakes.

Respond to this comment

Blarkon mutters...

Posted Monday

The thing about a great notebook - like those Duomos - is that it's such a beautiful notebook that I feel bad actually writing in it with my shitty handwriting.

Neal Stephenson writes the first draft of all his books longhand (there's even Neal Stephenson Fountain Pen geekery).

The handwriting recognition on MS tablets (which goes back to XP so it's been around a while) is very good at converting longhand - even my extremely shitty longhand. It's certainly faster than using an on-screen keyboard.

John Birmingham mumbles...

Posted Monday

Really? I'd have to see that to believe it.

Blarkon mumbles...

Posted Monday

Here you go - I youtubed it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxrMHybZhV4

robW reckons...

Posted 23 hours ago

I'm finishing up a software project that uses the Surface Pro (next get of this stuff) and the only reason I'm writing code for this expensive tablet/pc is because it does handwriting so well. Service people in the field (working in street construction) can use the pen to jot down the info needed to lock in the Geo coordinates with a description. Just say'n. . . .it does seem to work surprisingly well.

Respond to this thread

insomniac reckons...

Posted Monday

If i wrote in cursive it would look exactly like it did just prior to me stopping doing so at about age 11 or so: diabolical and childlike. I tend to print with letters that run together more so than joined up. I don't often write long pieces on paper unless I really want a personal touch such as when I wrote to my children after their grandfather died and they couldn't attend because they are scattered to the wind across the country. If I do write longer pieces I try and write more clearly than when I'm noting things down for myself, which is more like a scribble.

Respond to this comment

Dino not to be confused with is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

JB,

Handwriting has more nuance than Typewriting.

I lost a diary in 1997 with 'lots' of stuff in it.

Trying to remember it all is near on impossible.

It's only a small fraction of my lifetime.

Or is that an infraction?

Anyhoo it's not in my possession and the years go rolling on.

If I had put it in electronica or da interweb it wouldn't be private anymore.

Respond to this comment

WarDog swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Monday

Writing/typing - no difference sans muscle memory. If you need to speed up or slow down you can do it in either. I use both but nowadays treat any written material as immediately binnable because

  1. It's already out of date
  2. It can't be easily revised
  3. It's living in a non-backed up, short duration medium
  4. It's light cone (unless subsequently scanned) is limited to the speed of mechanical transport.

The pros for the written form are that it uses a low tech solution for times when a high tech one is not available. It can use some tools that are more portable, though this is starting to become less of a distinction (I use my Nexus7 and Swype to capture most notes now about as fast as I can type, notes which are then persisted in the cloud and available on all my other devices).

As to cursive, it'll always be there when you want it http://www.fontspace.com/category/cursive

Murphy would have you know...

Posted Monday

Printed form is not vulnerable to power failures, corrupted drives, and obsolete code. If you don't believe me, try to extract something off of your 3.5 floppy.

Respects,

Murph

On the Outer Marches

Greybeard reckons...

Posted Monday

I have a USB 3.5" floppy drive for that purpose. Somewhere there's a 5.25" but most MoBos don't have the right connection for that any more. Still, out in the shed there just might be one still working. Also have a working VCR for those daggy old weddding videos people decide to convert - about 10 years after they've turned to static.

Dick mumbles...

Posted Monday

Hey Greybeard, where's your 8" drive?

Dino not to be confused with puts forth...

Posted Monday

Dick,

It's floppy.

My 3 and a half inch is solid though!

Solid state mate!

WarDog mumbles...

Posted 24 hours ago

Murph/Greybeard - cloud. Anything local is only a local cache running on impermanent hardware. Anything of value on my old 5.25" floppies, yes Murph I remember those times before the 3.5" (I still have some 3.5" and 5.25" as art deco pieces), has long been migrated into more permanent stores.

And Murph power too cached be cached. Some of us have been using batteries for about 2 millenia.

Respond to this thread

Timmo has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

I tend to write in scruffy printing (with the occasional curlicue on g, y and f) that runs together somewhat.

I'm still in the old school at uni, writing notes in books rather than on laptops. It would be an interesting thing to see how many postgrad students use laptops compared to undergrads. From the back of the class it would be interesting to see how many are websurfing or using facebook instead (I've seen it on several occasions even in postgrad classes).

Laptops or typed text would make it easier when it comes timing to pulling it together for study etc, but I haven't yet got to listening and typing as easily as writing. I do occasionally use voice recording on the phone to track ideas, but not to dictation software.

Respond to this comment

w from brisbane asserts...

Posted Monday

Minor point: If you never learnt to write, it would be hard to have a signature.

It is still used in instruction, particularly in languages e,g. french, mathematics, chemistry, computer languages. Someone asked a question, seems natural to go to a whiteboard and quickly write some examples.

Still used in meetings when you are workshopping something. What are the things we need to be thinking about with this project? People start writing stuff on the board. It is how a group thinks out loud.

A good field scientist will always have paper and pencils, as backup. They are the relatively failsafe field recording system.

And most importantly, how else would we know the blackboard specials at the cafe or the pub?

WarDog asserts...

Posted Monday

"Minor point: If you never learnt to write, it would be hard to have a signature."

Digital. 256 bit

"seems natural to go to a whiteboard"

"People start writing stuff on the board. It is how a group thinks out loud."

Digital. Last 3 meetings I have had more than one of the participants was remote. We all communcated via the one Google doc real time. Could modify and annotate independently with tracking, commenting, archived side discussions with resolutions. It also makes it easier to embed links to back up claims and suggestions.

"how else would we know the blackboard specials"

Smart phone notification as you enter the joint. Something that remembers your preferences and highlights/sorts/filters the offerings for you.

w from brisbane would have you know...

Posted Monday

All good points Wardog. Yes, there are electronic options.

Re: your Google doc.
But, if you were all in the same room, you might also use the whiteboard. And the thinky would be different, I reckon.

Blackboard specials & smart phone notification. It is nice to look at a blackboard, your group gathered round. There could be computer screens now, however, the blackboard remains popular. Why? The tech must be good. And no need for wifi.

And what about graffiti? I don't want to be printing everything.

WarDog swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted 24 hours ago

Yes the thinky is slightly different. Better IMHO, multi-threaded as more than one person can be working on parts of a document at the same time whereas using a physical whiteboard has physical space constraints.

Re cafe speacials. My local now uses flat screens to display the specials. It';s pretty low tech all things considered and let's them stream other content such as the news and origin games, blackboards tend to struggle with that.

Grafitti? Printing? Sorry you lost me. You want to produce or consume grafitti? And then you want to print it? I have a digital collection of entertaining physical grafitti I have encountered. There are programs that allow you to digital grafit in their digital spaces, often mapped to the real world. You cna cloud print. Sorry just throwing things out there 'cause I'm not sure what you are after.

w from brisbane asserts...

Posted 23 hours ago

Re: the thinky would be different. With a whiteboard, people pause, they lean back, the fingers are laced behind the head, only one person has the whiteboard marker. Sometimes a period of slow thinking, like slow cooking, can produce a richer result.

Grafitti, that was a little joke. Me, with my big nikko pen, wanting options as a time-pressured graffitist.

Respond to this thread

yankeedog ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

Actually, once in a while I use the ol' longhand cursive, but more often than not I print, and it goes back to when I started drafting. See, kids, way back then people actually lettered the drawings, and all this was done by hand. Got so used to printing on drawings every day that it became second nature to print pretty much everything.

An analogy for my trade would be (despite having 3D CAD modeling software) sketching out things on a sheet of paper. There are times I do that before modeling up a part, which is kind of bass-ackwards-but it seems to work for me.

Respond to this comment

Murphy puts forth...

Posted Monday

Sadly or not, I lost what little ability I had to write in script years ago. On the other hand, I have retained the ability to write in print form (block letters, non cursive, whatever you want to call it). I can read it easily enough and more to the point, I can write at sufficient speed to get a fair bit of work down.

How much work?

Both of my professional level published stories, Tearing Down Tuesday and The Limb Knitter, were originally written in longhand form while I was working at my security guard job. Rewrites were conducted in the same fashion, though generally more targeted in nature.

In my other job at Birmo's military consultant, I use longhand to block out combat scenes in need of revision, scribble out those bits of local color that folks really like and fiddle with descriptive elements.

In terms of churning out sheer word count, an old school style clickety keyboard works best in creating quantity, but if I want quality, I use longhand.

Respects,

Murph

On the Outer Marches

Respond to this comment

pitpat is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

My cursive is crap but is still faster than my typing. I tend to end up with a crazy mix of print and cursive which can be a bit of a bitch for third parties to decipher when doing the data entry. I've had jobs in some mines which date back to the late 19th century ( Mt Lyell in particular) and reading the old field logs of the time was an absolute pleasure. The penmanship and the quirky detail is not seen today.

As W notes in the field a good notebook ( Chartwell survey books -currently uisng the 2647 with graph paper on one side and double spaced lines on the other) and a couple of good pencils are still the way to go. I've tried a couple of different tablet configurations but they seem time consuming, a bit limiting and a pain for sunlight readability.

Respond to this comment

Andrew Dugdell reckons...

Posted Monday

I tried to go all digital, but it nearly broke my soul and my wallet; I tried all the gizmos and gadgets. These days I file everything digital, but I take fsckloads of handwritten notes on mostly legal/junior legal notepads - there is just something that a scribble or a doodle on paper that at some level can't be captured with digital. But once I've finished I tear the pages out scan them with my nifty little scanner and bin them. ...sometimes I even make little explosion sounds as I hurl them across the room into the bin.

John Birmingham mutters...

Posted Monday

I keep meaning to scan my notebooks but, you know...

Dino not to be confused with mutters...

Posted Monday

Gotta get me one of doz nifty pens!

Ders books dat can raed too!

Blarkon reckons...

Posted Monday

Use the camera on your iPad to pull the pictures into Evernote. If you've got an Evernote subscription, it'll often do a servisable OCR on the text if the photograph is reasonable enough. That way your notes are also indexed.

Respond to this thread

Surtac reckons...

Posted Monday

Fascinating topic. As well as being a long time reader and book collector I’ve always been a bit of a stationery fetishist – an interesting pen and a well turned notebook will always get my attention.

I don’t do as much handwriting these days as I used to, but it’s still indispensable in my work situation. Most of my work output is expected to be in various document types (or artefacts as we call them in the enterprise architecture trade) – Word documents, Visio diagrams, pretty pictures etc. all designed to show relationships and inter-reactions between architectural elements and layers. There’s not that much narrative or creative text generation – it’s all descriptions of current state, desired future states, industry trends, transition roadmaps and such-like. This whole environment is too reactive for anything like even your daily planner, John. It’s all about lurching from ‘crisis’ to ‘crisis’ here.

But for documenting meetings or simply taking personal aide-memoire notes, I’ll do it by hand in a bound A4 notebook, detailing meeting time, subject, attendees, agreed actions and so on, along with anything else I feel like documenting. And it means I can doodle or start doing my own thing in my head if the meeting can’t hold my attention.

I can always write longhand much faster than I can type – the result is often unreadable, but it helps me get ideas out of my head faster as they compete to get out or run into one another. The simple act of writing things down forces me to do a better job of remembering stuff in the first place.

On the personal side, I maintain two or more notebooks. One is for lists of stuff I want to remember – wines I want to try again; music albums or dvd movies to look for on that next trip to JB HiFi; things I write down to remember now, before I forget to. That one generally lives in a shirt pocket. It’s the Cahier version of your small Moleskine and I actually have several of them, seeded around in various bags/organisers so I’m always likely to have one to hand with a spare pen and pencil when I need to record something.

The other is the next larger version of your small Moleskine set up to use as an Ideas Marathon, ie. To try to document thoughts and ideas as they occur daily. I’ve not been so successful with that one as it lives in my work backpack and is a bit too big for a pocket carry - I might have to physically downsize it to another Cahier or a smaller Moleskine.

Respond to this comment

tqft ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

All you people writing on paper are obviously jihadi cyber terrorists intent on keeping the government out of your evil evil thoughts.

My hand writing is crap. Like really bad. I could probably write something cursive if I had to. What's the non-joined up type of hand writing called? legibile but barely and used sparingly mostly for notes on printed working documents or on a whiteboard.

My signature is sort of legible for my name. But good luck anyone copying it.

Respond to this comment

Jigoku has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

Purely assumptively, I would suggest that the fine motor skills involved in typing would differ greatly to those used when writing and so use different neural pathways to achieve the same end, expressing thoughts in words.

Perhaps also the ability to change the structure of our current thought when typing prevents the further flow of it. I know I spend so much time getting each sentence "right" when typing that I lose my train of thought. When writing I would take more of a "I'll come back and reword it later" approach, where required.

As to whether I still use cursive, rarely. I personally don't have a need for it. I've even noticed that when I need to sign for a delivery or on a receipt it is very jittery and I have to think about how the letters are formed. Other times I'll start scrawling something, notice it is near illegible and either print it or open up Notepad++.

It probably still needs to be taught for a generation or two though, so kids can read their letters from Grandma, assuming she isn't already on Facebook ...

Respond to this comment

w from brisbane mutters...

Posted Monday

A facility with cursive script is essential if you want your little darlings to achieve the job of their dreams.

i.e. becoming a tattooist.

Respond to this comment

Brother PorkChop reckons...

Posted Monday

I am embarassed by my handwriting - a sad mix of cursive and something else. My 8 year od boy has nicer handwriting than me, and I certainly insist on the kids having proper handwriting. I am OK on a whiteboard, with diagrams, arrows and single words but pen and paper sentences are awesomely embarassing. Forget writing greeting cards!!

Respond to this comment

Ministry of the Interior asserts...

Posted Monday
I live in fear that my handwriting will end up being analysed by a forensic handwriting expert. Best for me to stick to a computer.

Respond to this comment

MarkM reckons...

Posted Monday

I can touch type at about 80 words per minute. I know I can't write that fast. Nothing beats sitting in front of the keyboard, pounding away my thoughts as quick as I can think them. This said, I like to write poetry long hand - there is something about having the pen poised while mulling over the right word.

Respond to this comment

she_jedi mumbles...

Posted Monday

My mum is a registered nurse and she's maintained for years that I should have been a doctor with my handwriting; the medical profession apparently being the only one where an illegible scrawl is a requirement.

Sadly I squandered the opportunity to have the mutant hybrid of printing and cursive that spews from the end of my pen professionally sanctioned and became a business analyst instead. For that sin I've had to learn to write legibly on a whiteboard, which, when your natural state is hieroglyphical chicken scratch, is HARD. My natural writing is so bad that sometimes ?I can't read it.

The whiteboard is invaluable though; every time I'm in a meeting or workshop where the vaguest hint of requirements gathering is needed I find myself bounding to the whiteboard to start scribbling as legibly as possible and start the thinky. I have colleagues who take bets on how long it'll take for me to hit the whiteboard. Every business analyst I know has a pathological need to whiteboard stuff, it's a professional hazard.

I find I type much faster than I write, and because I do so much writing for work and for study outside of work, I very rarely find myself needing to scribble long hand in order to get the creative juices flowing. Although when I'm writing a requirements document I find I get inspiration/motivation from any notes I've scribbled down, or the stuff I've done on the whiteboard with the group.

Next time I get stuck with an essay for uni I'll try the scribbling in long hand trick and see if that helps; I think my biggest problem in that respect is that my urge to procrastinate dampens my creativity. Suddenly things like housework become vitally important when an assignment is due, even though prior to the deadline I would be content living like a 20 year old male uni student, and happy to procrastinate on cleaning. Go figure.

Respond to this comment

Barnesm mutters...

Posted Monday

"When was the last time you picked up a pen or pencil and scratched out a line or two of handwriting?

as part of investigations I use a field notebook to jot down 'contemporaneous notes' which are a lot more believeable when you are on the stand in a court than a beautifully formated typed affidiavit.

Personally I think these are mearly different tools, the actual body of words you write are just another way of creating the story in anohters head, if that is the intent of your writing. Your writing it long hand 'uses different parts of the brain' is no doubt true, but the same principle would apply if you wrote it using a harp to pray notes that correspond to letters, the points is you use whatever too you grew up with.

Could Shakespear have written as well if he was given dragon dictation, probably not but by the same token the next great writer growing up today will probably look at you funny when 50 years from now you suggest using the new I-brainwave to write instead of his computer.

Respond to this comment

Dino not to be confused with has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

Anyhoo I asked The Ejamucation Minister a question between 4 and 5 pm today.

No Response.

We'll keep 'really quiet 'bout dem rabbits'.

Some of da kids are calling him Daffy Duck!

Respond to this comment

damian puts forth...

Posted Monday

Cursive? I imagine people who try to read my handwriting might be a bit cursive. Somewhere between the South Australia, Queensland and Victorian primary school systems I learned, relearned a different way, then had to start again, all of which has left a shorthandish printing style with the occasional gothic touch. Oddly if I try to do running writing it ends up a lot neater, a function of going back to grade 5 I suppose which is probably the last time I used it.

But that doesn't stop me from buying nice notebooks and filling them with my hideous scratchings. The little moleskine things that you will confuse with your passport, carry one of those everywhere, lasts about a month. Usually just random notes, but the ambition is that a longer effort might start there one day.

Mind you I get a bit retro with marks on paper. I quite like the idea of bashing out a few hundred pages on the wonderful little Imperial manual typewriter (late 40s I think) that I picked up for practically nothing at the Rocklea flea markets a few years back.

Respond to this comment

RobertL swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Monday
I can't even write in cursive any more. Years of taking notes at uni and at work have caused my writing to devolve to messy block printing. Usually done on the reverse of old printed documents. It's a sad and sorry tale of woe.

Respond to this comment

Durand has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

JB, what you need is a Livescribe Smartpen. Inside the pen is a tiny camera that can see what you're writing. You use special paper with printed micro-dots, so small that only the camera can read what they say. And by using both, the pen is able to render the page as a PDF, that can be saved to Evernote, and is thus available on all your devices.

Better yet, there is an onboard microphone that records what is being said at the time you're writing. You play back the recording by touching the pen to the paper, and it starts playing back what was being said while your pen was writing that note.

http://www.livescribe.com/en-us/

John Birmingham reckons...

Posted Yesterday

Ah, cheers. I was trying to think of this today.

damian swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Yesterday

Been curious about those things since seeing one on display in Orificeworks. They seem a touch expensive for what they are, and in particular given that you need to keep buying special paper for it to make it work.

The handwriting recognition on Android seems fast and I would think no less accurate. I think we're not far from the fondleslabs all doing this trick pretty nicely.

Blarkon asserts...

Posted 21 hours ago

They already do - see my above posted youtube showing handwriting recognition of my really shit handwriting on the Surface. The way that MS managed to get this technology to work pretty well involved them about a decade ago buying up some massive collections of different handwriting styles and using those as the basis of building recognition. I've found Steve Jobs aversion to the stylus to be interesting as it precludes that sort of recognition being *directly* supported on Apple devices.

Moleskine has a special "Evernote Edition" - the special paper is already there and evernote has routines to automatically scan and OCR it. http://evernote.com/moleskine/

Respond to this thread

Aeryn asserts...

Posted Yesterday

I still write in longhand. It comes in handy at TAFE for making notes during class, and I don't always carry my laptop or iPad when I'm out and about - if I get a snippet of an idea for my novel in my head while I'm away from home, I can just jot it down in the notebook I always have with me. My handwriting is a cross between print and cursive, though at this point it's predominantly cursive - it works for me, and other people can read it, so I see no reason to change it.

Respond to this comment

Carrick lad mumbles...

Posted Yesterday

Thanks JB. This bit of thinky from the excellent Gillian Tett in the FT got me thinking about this earlier this year - http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/e27e8b6e-5abb-11e2-bc93-00144feab49a.html#axzz2WTEkuPpX.

As a transactional lawyer, most of my heavy duty drafing is done straight into a document on a screen in MSWord - only efficient way to do it. Some colleagues still mark up a document by hand and give it to a WP operator but I don't see the point - my near illegible scrawl doesn't help.

On dictation, we outsource this to our centre in Manila - given my thick Irish accent, I've never tried it although I'm morbidly curious to see what would come back. Digital dictation software hasn't been brought in yet as (certainly for transactional lawyers) it's a marginal form of work output. Most correspondence nowadays is on e-mail and this is very much DIY.

However, if I want to think and something out, blank bit of paper and a pen is where I start - haven't found a technology solution as effective (yet). Digital post-its rock though.

John Birmingham swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Yesterday

Yeah, my wife is a lawer, and she does a heap of screentime every day but her fingers are still ink stained.

Respond to this thread

CathieT mumbles...

Posted Yesterday

Cursive? Only when I'm taking meeting minutes - makes it easier to write faster! I'd be the only one who could read it though, and at times even I have trouble.

My printing is very, very neat when it has to be - a year of handwriting accounts for a doctor's surgery saw to that.

Son and heir's school has decreed that all the Year 8s work from iPads this year, with only their music manuscript and Japanese workbooks being pen to paper. He was struggling with some stuff the other night until I showed him how much sense it made to scrawl it out on ye olde scrap paper!!

Oh and in a strange twist, I have two fonts on my computer that are my handwriting - print and cursive!!

w from brisbane is gonna tell you...

Posted Yesterday

Re: music manuscripts

On the separate topic of sheet music.
I heard, with the band for the musical King Kong, the musicians all have the sheet music on Ipads and the conductor turns the everyone's page with a wifi foot pedal.
I think they said it was a world first.

Respond to this thread

April K has opinions thus...

Posted Yesterday

I'm currently in the thankless and often lack-luster process of writing my PhD and if it wasn't for a notebook and pen, I doubt it would ever have even started! When I'm in the zone and have direction and know my argument, I can smash out 120words an hour on my funky bew Mac Air but if I didn't have the opportunity to scribble through and that blank open page to deal with my mismatched arguments and differing opinions, I'd be nowhere!

That said, I also use longhand to take notes if I'm at a conference as I find it helps me concentrate on the speaker (even if I'm bored). I watch uni undergrads on their laptops and wonder how much they are getting out of classes when they are chatting to the person across the room on Facebook.

John Birmingham mumbles...

Posted Yesterday

Answer: they're not getting much

Murphy would have you know...

Posted Yesterday

The students who are using tech gear are usually doing everything but paying attention to the material. And they almost always fail the course.

Respects,

Murph

On the Outer Marches

Respond to this thread

AliCrampHand mutters...

Posted Yesterday
I got hand cramp in my accounting exam today! Accounting exam! [Gets shouty] Who gets cramps in a numbers based test? I should just hand in my pens now & submit to keyboard auto correct nonsense. Sigh. [Hangs head in shame]

Respond to this comment

robW ducks in to say...

Posted 23 hours ago

As a young teen way back in 1965 I read "The Fury Out of Time" by Lloyd Biggle. I remember in his novel he posited that in the way-way-forward-future our descendants lose the ability to 'read' and "write" per se, but maintain the ability to manipulate images and iconography on screens with hand motions (he preceeds Apple's patents on multitouch by 30 years).

Maybe in the future we will all write like the Italians of today communicate: we will shout at hidden microphones while waving our hands around and making eye-contact with some attractive person in the room totally removed from the conversation.

Cursive will require a rosetta stone of some sort or another.

Respond to this comment

Ginger Megs mumbles...

Posted 21 hours ago

I'm a mature-age post-grad student, and I cannot produce any work of any worth unless I first play with the words on paper. This means I have notebooks and notepads chokka-blok full of ideas and partial sentences. I need to hand write everything, and the stuff I produce this way is generally not bad. What I find frustrating is the push from my supervisors to ditch the pen and type my thoughts directly into the computer. I think this is because my way is slower than they would like, but my thoughts and ideas cannot take their proper form unless they move from my fingers to paper and are shaped by me physically moving a pen. It doesn't need to be a 'proper' pen - an el cheapo plastic gel pen is best as it flows easily. There is a little romance in filling a page with my words. I see my much younger post-grad peers constantly pecking at their laptops and notebooks and tablets, and wonder if they find the joy and satisfaction in the plastic keys that I find with my plastic pen and newsagent school exercise books.

Respond to this comment

Dino not to be confused with mumbles...

Posted 21 hours ago

JB

As an aside-

You is getting some amazing traffic today!

Do da hokey pokey!

Respond to this comment

Will swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted 21 hours ago

When my kids were taught to write joined-up at primary school, I became so ashamed of my post-college handwriting that I took classes and practised caligraphy for 10 years. The result is that now, decades later, I still love to pick up a pen, any pen, at the least excuse. Most of the above comments totally ignore the pleasure of forming or reading beautiful letters. The world is the poorer for it.

she_jedi would have you know...

Posted 19 hours ago

My grandfather had the most beautiful copperplate handwriting. I despair whenever I think of the way he would write vs the horrific mutant chicken scratch I come up with. I think calligraphy classes would be awesome, I might look into those as the next project after I finish my ancient history degree. It would be lovely to learn to not only handwrite properly but beautifully.

Respond to this thread

Vanessa mumbles...

Posted 20 hours ago

I wish I could print... then maybe other people could read my writing!

Respond to this comment

nikx swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted 17 hours ago

my son has hi-functioning autism and one obstacle he meets in (mainstream) primary school is to focus on the technique of handwriting, spelling and at the same time producing content. he has excellent spelling, and lots to say, but all together will not come out easily. the teachers and special needs staff have been using ipad and typing, saying "he won't need handwriting much in the future, who does really?". I have now explicitly asked to use typing only occasionally. I want him to train the automatism of writing more (i am also doing some at home). it's essential excercise for the brain. it doesn't matter if 'we don't need it anymore' (really?). he is getting there, slowly, he can type anyway already better than his peers. I believe it's like learning a foreign language in school. the point isn't really if or when you will use it. it's the learning progress that is formative for your brain.
in my son's case, it's harder, but i think it would be a mistake to just give up, because : computers..

Respond to this comment

Jane mumbles...

Posted 14 hours ago

There something deeply satisfying about filling a page with script, of using a pen until the ink runs out. Of writing so fast (but not too fast) that an idea emerges and at other times writing slowly and savouring the form of every letter. I dunno. Maybe I've been scarred by watching The Pillowbook and inspired by reading Shadow of the Wind, but I love script. Not type.

Respond to this comment

Steve enters the fray asserts...

Posted 13 hours ago

Oddly enough in days long gone, when I was first an IT man (you know, before it was cool to be nerdy) working on Mainframes I did all my doc in long hand, and a bunch of typists typed it up for me. When I got my first PC with good old MS Word, I was stumped. Sure I could write COBOL and SQL straight from a (hand written) design, but words and actual human communication? No way!! So I did the doc long hand and typped it in. How times have changed. I have trouble putting a sentence together with a pencil in my hand these days, but thoughts flow through a keyboard no problem. I love that I can learn things.

Anthony mutters...

Posted 10 hours ago

Ah, the joys of filling in the little boxes on the forms and sending them away to be punched into cards by teams of nubile young women. And getting them back, waiting for the cards to go through the compiler and the compile failing because the writing was misread by said nubile young women.

My cursive is awful but I can still print pretty well.

Respond to this thread

YB mumbles...

Posted 8 hours ago

Pure blazing speed of creation: Type straight into MS Notepad, no editing

Make raw text into a formated, correctly spelled and formated document: MS Word or gmail inbuilt editor.

A personal note to someone important: Cursive

A note where the information is critical, or forms: Printing (Block)

To make something beautiful: I do calligraphy (1460's Germanic mainly)

Respond to this comment

Trashman mumbles...

Posted 7 hours ago

Any thoughts on doing a Blunty on the ADF Cheif's speech about the cutbacks?

A serving General willing to put his head above the parapet is a rarity!

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Joined up writing'

So, anyone seen World War Z yet?

Posted Monday into Movies by John Birmingham

I have the kids underfoot for three weeks and was thinking it might get some work done if I put them into terrified catatonia. Don't know that WWZ is the way to go though. It seems to have gone out of it's way to up-end the tradition of heritage encrusting the genre.

The fast zombie thing has become a 'swarm zombie' thing in this movie, and in a way has removed some the visceral, intimate horror. Getting eaten and zombified in this flick is akin to getting dumped by a wave of flesh at Undead Beach. Less a personal thing, than an accident of nature.

Still, I'll go see it this week, even if on my own. I suspect the secret is to get into a big dumb action movie head space and just enjoy the ride. The initial reviews have been surprisingly positive, or at least not awful. Fairfax ran a couple of long pieces over the weekend, one of them an unexpectedly friendly treatment by Craig Mathieson, the other more of an essay/profile of the director.

Mathieson thought it totally worth seeing, dismissing all the pre-release doom and gloom with one wave of the hand. Z, he said, "is a very good film."

The essay was interesting enough to make me search for the tag line identifying it as a buy-in from the US... But no. It was local boy Karl Quinn, parlaying what looked like a few minutes interview time with Marc Forster into a long and relatively thinky contemplation of the zombie as modern culture meme. (No, really, it reads well).

The seeming endlessness of the onslaught is a crucial aspect of the zombocalypse scenario: the zombie horde represents a threat so enormous it seems impossible to defy. It is infinitely substitutable for the many things we suspect threaten us but we struggle to contemplate: to Forster's resource depletion and overpopulation we might add nuclear war, viral epidemics such as HIV and SARS, even mindless consumerism.

Each has generated its own iterations of the zombie story, or at least its own readings of the zombie genre. In the hands of left-leaning cultural critics, the film that started it all - George A. Romero's low-budget black-and-white Night of the Living Dead (1968) - was an allegory for the mindless waste of life that was the Vietnam War. His 1978 sequel Dawn of the Dead, with the action moved from a remote farmhouse to a suburban shopping mall, was a devastating critique of the empty lives of American consumers lulled into ignoring the ills of the world by the allure of all that shiny plastic.

The English zom-com Shaun of the Dead (2004) played a variation on the same tune: the repetitive pattern of life in suburban London is barely distinguishable from zombiedom; and in the end it's almost interchangeable, as Shaun and his best mate - by now a zombie, albeit one in restraints - resume the session on the gaming console they'd started before the plague set in.

But lets not leave the question to these film wankers. Who's seen this fucking thing and is it any good?

13 Responses to ‘So, anyone seen World War Z yet?’

Nicole mutters...

Posted Monday

No.

I tried to see an advanced screening over the weekend but they were all 3D. Wearing glasses over glasses is a deal-breaker for me.

If you shout me a ticket I'll buy the popcorn and smuggle in a hip flask..?

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

I very much approve of viewing zombie films while munted.

Respond to this thread

Brother PorkChop has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

No, but I feel an afternoon sickie coming on later this week, cough, cough, sniff, sniff, headache. Best go and sit somewhere dark for a couple of hours....

Respond to this comment

HAVOCK21 puts forth...

Posted Monday

NO, but thinking I might this wek fkn loks tre fkn wickedness baby yeah!

Respond to this comment

MarkM has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

I saw it at a preview screening last week. Having read the book, I was concerned about what Forster might do. Turning the zombies from classic lumbering undead into bastard, speedy undead only upped the action, which is a good think in an action flick. But it was well played and I didn't feel like it wasted my time - always a good thing as far as I'm concerned.

John Birmingham has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

Thx for that. I suspect that'll be my reaction too.

Respond to this thread

Barnesm asserts...

Posted Monday

As soon as I realised that the only extent to which this was World War Z was the title and I let go of the intial buring rage over them not making that movie, which to be fair I think would work much better as a TV series in the style of Ken Burn's Civil War, I am looking forward to this film as an excellent action-zombie film. The first of the blockbuster summer zombie films.

Sorry would have posted earlier but I no longer can post comments through explorer at work. Its only happened in the last week.

Respond to this comment

ShaneAlpha would have you know...

Posted Monday

Plan on seeing it this weekend. Will remove all knowlege of book from brain first.

Managed to get an advance screening of Despicable Me 2 yesterday, can highly recommend taking your kids to it JB, and you'll enjoy it too. Has that 2 level kid/adult thing going. Several funny scenes for adults and the kids stuff had me laughing too. I think you'll be particularly taken with the whole "eldest girl dating" bits.

Bondiboy66 reckons...

Posted 20 hours ago

Yep I'll have to do the same thing. Loved the book, but aside of zombies and the title, I believe the movie is the 3rd cousin twice removed and thrown over the fence of the book.

Respond to this thread

Joanna puts forth...

Posted Monday

I look forward to seeing World War Z. The shorts look great, plus it stars Brad Pitt. Win win. Opens on 20 June in Brissie.

Respond to this comment

Trashman reckons...

Posted Yesterday

I'll probably see it as a big dumb action movie. Every time I see that wall in the trailer I flash on Judgement Day from Judge Dredd in 2000AD.

I still think zombies should shamble though - dead people should not be faster than Usain Bolt!

Respond to this comment

Mat D mumbles...

Posted 19 hours ago

Read the book earlier on in the year (over a 2 day period), absolutely loved it, so a read it again the same week.

The movie has not disappointed at all. It is not like the book set 15 years after the event with everyone reminiscing. Its set now during the event whilst searching for the means to stop the horde spreading (so basically the first third of the book). Leaves it open for a sequel into fighting the Zombies to take back the cities.

Respond to this comment

ShaneAlpha mumbles...

Posted 12 hours ago

If they don't have Redgums "A walk in the light green" at the end, like the book, it loses all meaning. :)

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'So, anyone seen World War Z yet?'

Madame Quokka's cheesecake (UPDATED with recipe.)

Posted Sunday into Food & Drink by John Birmingham

I repaired to a local noshery on Saturday, bleary and sleep deprived from supervising a tween-grrl sleepover, and then tidying up after said event. Luckily Mme Q was there (along with Lord Bob, Morgana and some architect). I soothed my frayed nerves with a few glasses of pedestrian rosé, a kilo of Lamb Iskander and two slices of Mme Q's cheesecake.

I am a fan of cheesecake, and especially the variety baked in New York or the New York style (as Murph will attest). This was a fine example, with rum-soaked raisins and a crumbly dark biscuit base, about which there was, I believe, some controversy.

It seemed the very exemplar of a cheesecake base to me and I am nothing if not a professional in these matters.

Apologies for the poor focus. I was distracted by the prospect of eating the subject.

I believe I may have had two slices, and no dinner that night.

Mme Q has kindly graced us with her recipe.

Rum & Raisin Cheesecake

Preparation time: 40 minutes
Total cooking time: 1 hour 10 minutes
Serves 10 – 12

BISCUIT BASE:
400 gm biscuits (1 ½ packs of butternut snaps or gingernuts)
60g chopped butter, melted

FILLING:
750gm light/low fat cream cheese, softened
½ cup castor sugar
3 tablespoons dark rum (may need extra)
¾ cup raisins
3 eggs, separated
300 gm sour cream (light/low fat)
1 tablespoon plain flour
Ground nutmeg

METHOD
1-2 days before baking, soak the raisins in rum. Seal bowl in cling wrap. Splash a bit more rum in each day till raisins have reached optimum saturation.

BISCUIT BASE
• Grease a 23cm round springform tin with melted butter.
• Line the base with non-stick baking paper.
• Crush the biscuits, mix in melted butter.
• Press biscuit mix into base of tin and refrigerate till firm. (tip, use disposable gloves or a layer of plastic wrap to press it down and push the mix 3cm or so up the sides to create a pie shell)
• Preheat the oven to 160C.

FILLING
• Beat the cream cheese till soft.
• Gradually beat in the sugar and 2 oz rum. (unless there is still this much swimming around in the raisin bowl)
• Separate the eggs. Add the egg yolks one at a time, beating well after each addition.
• Beat in the sour cream and the flour. Mix should be the consistency of thick cream & be lump-free.
• Fold in the raisins.
• In a clean, dry bowl, using clean dry beaters, beat the egg whites until stiff peaks form. (Do this last as once beaten they break down quickly)
• Whisk the egg whites lightly into the cream cheese mix.
• Pour the filling over the prepared crust.
• Sprinkle lightly with nutmeg.

BAKING
• Bake in a 160C oven for around 1 hour 10 minutes or until firm to the touch.
• Allow cheesecake to cool in the oven then refrigerate.

NOTES:
• I cook this on fan-bake, in the centre of the oven. It will crack but it will also rise and be very light. Cook on Classic Bake for a denser non-cracked cake.

67 Responses to ‘Madame Quokka's cheesecake (UPDATED with recipe.)’

Spanner mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Where is Spanner's cheesecake?

Yes where. Is. Spanner's. Cheese. Cake?

John Birmingham has opinions thus...

Posted Sunday

I ate it.

Spanner asserts...

Posted Sunday

Touché JB. Touché.

Respond to this thread

tqft ducks in to say...

Posted Sunday

Unacceptable. No samples for the masses.

Respond to this comment

Dino not to be confused with is gonna tell you...

Posted Sunday

And one for the Missus?

John Birmingham mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Gone.

Quokka reckons...

Posted Sunday

Khan Greybeard just ate the last of it. With clotted cream and fresh raspberries.

Respond to this thread

NBlob reckons...

Posted Sunday

It is occasionally difficult to express oneself fully in text. So in order to properly express my appreciation you'll have to imagine me with my shirt pulled up over my face an running around with my arms outstretched.

I wish I could do my famous "I got cheesecake & You didn't" dance for Khan Greybeard's benefit, but it would seem Aunty Q is a sucker for decrepitude.

Respond to this comment

Quokka mumbles...

Posted Sunday

I ate it for breakfast. And still feel sick.

Respond to this comment

Big Willie Style ducks in to say...

Posted Sunday

Bloke I work with bakes cakes as a bit of a hobby. Per my request, he made a chocolate cheesecake on my birthday last year, and I kindly consented to letting the rest of the staff have a glimpse before repairing to my office and eating it. I was still having sugar-induced hallucinations a week later.

I like cheesecake.

Respond to this comment

beeso puts forth...

Posted Sunday

I find baked cheesecake like Star Trek, boring and unsatisfying.

John Birmingham mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Ah, you speak of that which you do not know. Is this normal for the internet?

beeso swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Sunday

Have you tried the other kind?

John Birmingham mutters...

Posted Sunday

I am friend to all the cheesecakes.

Timmo has opinions thus...

Posted Sunday

I'm with ya Beeso - I much prefer the rich stickiness of the unbaked kind than the baked ones.

Respond to this thread

BWS mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Hang on. She took her own cheesecake to an eatery? How did that go down with the owner?

Quokka would have you know...

Posted Yesterday

It was smuggled in as Birthday Cake. They were really very obliging, especially given the mess we left behind us. It's a very messy cake.

Respond to this thread

NBlob puts forth...

Posted Sunday

Crazy Turk owner was past out on home brew Arak so didn't care. Waitress was so slow she may not have noticed.

Respond to this comment

Quokka swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Sunday

I bribed them. With cheesecake.

Respond to this comment

Greybeard is gonna tell you...

Posted Sunday

It was a very good cheesecake. Right down to the last (the very last) crumbs. But I must respond to Aunty Q with my signature dish, the salted caramel brownies. Prepare yourself Q!

Quokka is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

I get the bad feeling that preparation involves 3 weeks on the treadmill and 100 situps a day.

Coriolisdave reckons...

Posted Monday

This thread is useless without recipes.

USELESS.

John Birmingham mutters...

Posted Yesterday

And now you have a recipe

Respond to this thread

Murphy ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

I see we are now out of the closet about it rather than drenching it with blueberry sauce and calling it a serving of fruit.

My own digestive problems make cheesecake consumption problematic but just before our lunch with Birmingham back in 2009, Cindy and I shared a bit of cheesecake in Central Park, right by the memorial to the USS Maine. Not only was it the best cheesecake I'd ever had, it didn't tear up my stomach either.

Birmingham, having missed out, got his at Carnegie Deli after a mountainous pastrami on rye.

The texture on the above subject is different from what I am used to. I wonder why that is? I'm used to seeing something more solid, creamy whereas the above looks more cake like in texture.

This is not meant as a criticism (I'm half a planet away so it is not like I can sample it) but an honest question.

Respects,

Murph

On the Outer Marches

Quokka would have you know...

Posted Monday

Murph - this is probably because I share Beeso's opinions of baked cheesecake, and this one seems to be lighter and has more flavour than the traditional NYC. I like eating it hot out of the oven when it is still light and fluffy and the rum is still steaming out of the raisin's engorged bellies.

I used Arnott's Butternut Snap biscuits for the base (with some grumbling from The Bloke that I did not use gingernuts, his personal fave) and I think the texture arises from separating the eggs. You whisk the eggwhites until stiff peaks form (meringue consistency) and swirl that through the philly cheese, sour cream, sugar, egg yolk & raisin mix at the very last. Not that I passed high school chemistry, but I think that helps to aerate the mix so it comes out very moist and light and fluffy.

I usually start soaking the raisins in rum 2-3 days prior to cooking. Recipe calls for 3 oz rum but I just keep topping it up each day until the raisins have reached their capacity with sucking it all in.

My only sorrow is that I'm reduced to using Bundy Rum. We had a friend who lived in Fiji who used to visit sporadically, bearing gifts of Bounty Overproof 60% alcohol dark rum. You could probably run a lawn mower on it but wow, it made the best R&R brownies and cheesecakes that I've ever done. I miss that stuff.

Murphy mumbles...

Posted Monday

Wow, thanks for the response, Quokka.

I'm so used to eating cheesecake chilled.

Respects,

Murph

On the Outer Marches

Quokka reckons...

Posted Monday

No worries, Murph.

I compared notes with my NYC recipe (which may not be what you guys are used to but seems similar to what I've eaten in cafes here) and my recipe uses half the quantity of sugar, 3 eggs instead of 4 and twice as much sour cream. NYC uses normal cream, I think.

Also only 1 oz of flour, so it gets more of the texture of a light quiche or a custardy thing when it's hot. It's definitely not as solid as a NYC when it's chilled and while it's still good, its an entirely different beast. It's not as sweet, you can taste the rum & the sour cream. Normally I'd use Light (low fat) cream cheese but unfortunately for all our waist lines, the store was out when I did my pantry stocking.

I don't think I could make it, much less eat it, in one of our tropical summers.

If anyone wants the recipe I will charge Khan Greybeard with the task of posting it. You've all heard the tales of my Tech Destroying Force Field. No need to explain my relationship with the scanner, surely?

Untamed Snark ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

Yes please to the recipe!

I am always looking for a good baked cheesecake recipe, my grandfather (Hungarian) used to make a wonderful one with a the boozy rasins and a shortcrust latice over the top, sadly I don't have his recipe and the ones I have made up or found just don't compare.

The one in the picture looks texturally the same as his

Bangar ducks in to say...

Posted Yesterday

Aunty have you tried CSR Inner Circle rum OP much nicer than Bundy. Thanks for the recipe.

Madam Morgana puts forth...

Posted Yesterday

This was an outstanding cheesecake. I wish I could eat it again. Oh, and thanks everyone for a delightful lunch.

Disclaimer: that attending architect was not the shaven-legged arrow wielding scourge of the bikeways. It was some other dude.

Respond to this thread

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Monday

The baked New York style cheesecake is uniquely American and worthy of jingoistic pride. Bravo, Q.

I know what I want when I return your way. I'll trade you a neck tie I borrowed from some punter.

The classic crust is a combination of butter and what we call Graham Crackers. I'n not sure what a dark biscuit is but it sounds like the title of a really awful science fiction space horror movie ("In space no one can hear you ask for a glass of milk").

"I ate it for breakfast. And still feel sick."

That is because you ate too much (understandable) and probably didn't include strong black coffee.

Quokka is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

PNB I only ever make this in winter as the temps allow for weeks of loose clothing to disguise the inflation of the inner tubing that goes hand in hand with baked cheesecake.

In summer I make a cheesecake slice which has three layers - a shortbread-like pastry, cheesecake filling and a passionfruit jelly on top. Which means you can delude yourself you've consumed a light dessert of tropical fruit.

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan mumbles...

Posted Monday

Unacceptable. I want what those pictures show.

The raisins are optional.

Lulu ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

Uniquely American, you say? Yet somehow that picture up there looks a lot like the cheesecakes my (late) German grandmother used to make. I think NYC must have a large population of Central European grandmothers who brought their recipes with them.

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan asserts...

Posted Monday

Okay, perhaps I exaggerated. But only a bit. New York style cheese cake riffs off of German Käsekuchen just as American fruit pies descend from strudel. The result is reminicent of the European original but very American in the final analysis.

Respond to this thread

damian reckons...

Posted Monday

So sorry we weren't able to make it, sounds a pleasant day. I feel another expeditionary incursion to Redcliffistan is in order; perhaps a handful of weekends from now.

Respond to this comment

Quokka reckons...

Posted Monday

Ah well, sick elderly relatives trumps cocktails and cheesecake. You were very good to go visit the old timer. And think of the suffering you've been spared on the treadmill, burning it all off.

John Birmingham swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Monday

I am just about to hit that treadmill.

Respond to this thread

Quokka reckons...

Posted Monday

Give it a sucker punch from me.

Respond to this comment

Brother PorkChop mumbles...

Posted Monday

It looks divine. Baked cheesecake has to be the winner. Does it work well with Ginger Nut biscuit base? And boozed up raisins!!

Respond to this comment

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan would have you know...

Posted Monday

It would work great with a ginger nut buscuit base.

Quokka asserts...

Posted Monday

Definitely. It's just that I vaguely recall a conversation at Blunty where someone was dissing gingernuts and for the life of me I cannot remember who. So I deemed it safer to use the butternuts.

These are close in flavour to what we here in Oz call an Anzac Biscuit. The gingernuts are much sweeter and they pack a punch but they're a lovely contrast with the sourness/rumminess of the filling. Hence my spouse's whining. If his body floats in on the tide, he had it coming.

Brother PorkChop would have you know...

Posted Monday

Done. I was going to do steamed golden syrup pudding this weekend but it is now going to be an attempt on the Mme Quokka cheesecake deluxe with boozy fruit and gingernut biscuit base.

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan has opinions thus...

Posted Monday

Make sure you let us know how it turns out.

Respond to this thread

Simon ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

drool. I love cheesecake as well. I interviewed my now mother-in-law to make sure she was able to pass the cheesecake test (you can't be too careful). I also bake a controversial cheesecake - the chocolate biscuit base has a liberal mixture of a cocoa/chilli mix.

John Birmingham ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

What the...!

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan puts forth...

Posted Monday

What an interesting concept. Chocolate and chilli is a great combination. It just has to go well with the creamy goodness of cheese cake.

Simon mutters...

Posted Monday

The trick is to not overdo the chilli (powder).

Respond to this thread

insomniac reckons...

Posted Monday

Chocolate + Chilli + Cherry + Cheesecake/Cupcake = C4

Respond to this comment

Quokka puts forth...

Posted Monday

Right. I just sent JB the file with the cheesecake recipe, dumbed down (or made clearer) from the original Family Circle recipe that I modified - becoz the one in their book didn't FKN work.

Hopefully there's no typos. If so I blame sugar burnout.

Being as school holidays are upon us I've adapted it to make it easier for junior master-chef practice. And for those of you who are likely to absorb more rum than the raisins do, and who are as such at risk of becoming mildly addled.

damian swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Yesterday

I have my mum's handwritten notes somwhere for a polenta fruit cake that I think would appeal to cheesecake fans. This thought is based mostly around texture and a sort of sensibility around flavor. As I recall (it's a few years since either of us made one), it's deceptively healthy.

Will dig out one day, the old Robert Carrier book it's stuck in is on one of the shelves down in the hold.

Respond to this thread

Dino not to be confused with mutters...

Posted Monday

Thanks Muchly,

I have made 1 cheesecake in my life so far.

Gonna have a go at dis one!

It looks beautiful.

Thank You

Respond to this comment

Aunty Lou asserts...

Posted Yesterday

Wow! Madame Quokka is most generous! Not sure that I would do the same...assuming that I ever made anything that was worthy of the expressions of delight that this cheesecake has elicited. Thank you so much. I have always been a bit scared of having a bash at baked cheesecakes...but I think the said dumbing down may be sufficient to tempt!

Respond to this comment

Quokka mutters...

Posted Yesterday

I am a great believer that if you can read, you can cook. My mother died when I was 6 and Dad's repertoire extended to fry ups for breakfast, ham sandwiches with a thick layer of tomato sauce for lunch, and chops for dinner. Unsurprisingly I became a vegetarian at 15.

I am a self-taught cook, with some gracious input from my grandmother, who came from a family of bakers and whose cakes and biscuits were legendary, and some hippy house-mates who passed on the art of making lentils edible.

So as much as I would have loved to grow up under the guidance of 3 generations of CWA grand poobahs, truly, I'm evidence that it's a skill you can learn from reading, practice, and having no irate mother to scream at you when you fuck up and burn holes in the kitchen lino. All things considered, Dad took that rather well.

Brother PorkChop swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted 23 hours ago

This weekend's mission is to try the new recipe. Much appreciated!!

Quokka reckons...

Posted 14 hours ago

Bon Appetit, Brother Porkchop.

It was interesting to hear those of you with German/Eastern European heritage saying that the recipe looked familiar. Ages ago, before West End became yuppified, there was an annual multi-cultural festival in Musgrave Park. I remember spending an inordinate amount of time at the Russian Cake Stall where they had the most fabulous array of exotic and unfamiliar baked goods. I ate my way through many samples and what I couldn't eat I took home. I think that might have been what drew me to this cheesecake recipe, I thought I'd seen something similar before.

Respond to this thread

NBlob has opinions thus...

Posted 17 hours ago
WAIT A MOMENT. Security. SECURITY. Someone let a leaf & twig muncher in here. After all her talking up of salty porcine goodness she accidently outs herself @ 50+ comments as, as a, I barely have the courage to whisper it; a vego.

Respond to this comment

Quokka reckons...

Posted 15 hours ago
Relax Nblob, it didn't stick beyond the 7 year itch point. At which point I got glandular fever, became very thin & anaemic & had to be re-issued with my Carnivore Badge. Still not a big fan of meat but will put it in my body 3-4 x pw, just enough to keep my iron count. Bacon is the only animal product I would genuinely miss if I were to go all tofu & betel leaf again. Oh wait, they're still some of my favourite things.

Respond to this comment

NBlob ducks in to say...

Posted 15 hours ago
Whew. You had a fella worried. I had wondered how you keep your girlish trim figure in the face of bakery noms. When you said the V word, it all fell into place. V's beong all undernourished & such. Now the Most Likely Hypothesis is something the Coven cooked up; Eye of Newt type business.

John Birmingham is gonna tell you...

Posted 15 hours ago

As if I'd let one a them in here.

Quokka asserts...

Posted 2 hours ago

Ah, Nblob, I would cite decades of consistency with clean living and regular exercise but none would believe me. So yes, its the Dark Arts and a diet of small unruly and unmissed children.

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan ducks in to say...

Posted 2 hours ago

I am a baco-vegan (a vegan who eats bacon). Is my status here in jeopardy?

Respond to this thread

Quokka swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted 14 hours ago

Oh yes. The same high level security system that took nearly a year before you lot figured out I was a GRRRRRL.

Respond to this comment

NBlob is gonna tell you...

Posted 13 hours ago
After the "unfortunate sequence of assumptions" with (surprisingly) Brother Enjoy Medway " gender asignations were verboten.

damian puts forth...

Posted 13 hours ago

On the internet, no-one knows that you're a dog.

Bangar puts forth...

Posted 12 hours ago

Until the web cam comes on ;)

Respond to this thread

Respond to 'Madame Quokka's cheesecake (UPDATED with recipe.)'

Wrote a Blunty and then forgot it

Posted Sunday by John Birmingham

And it was about cyclists too. Murderous arrow shooting cyclists.

Somewhat surprisingly, some of the comments were rather humourless.

10 Responses to ‘Wrote a Blunty and then forgot it’

Bunyip is gonna tell you...

Posted Sunday

Mate once made a cross bow out of a car leaf suspension spring. Made some bolts out of cut down arrows. We test fired it in his back yard. Went through the paling fence, through the neighbours fence, and we lost track of it after that. There was no screaming from two houses over, so we didn't think we hit anyone.

Would go rather neatly through the doors of a car. Just saying....

Brother PorkChop puts forth...

Posted Monday

I made a longbow out of PVC pipe, arrows out of Tassie oak. I did put some drawn steel target tips on the arrows but I nearly wet myself when the bloody thing went through the chicken coop and half out the other side. I made the kids bows very careully after that but I have also had a great time doing some clout archery. Yesterday was an almost perfect day for it.

I have thought about making a crossbow but maybe not after reading your story.

Respond to this thread

Joanna mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Fabulous, JB. Next thing you know, the Brisbane cyclist jihad will be spiking pedestrians off our footpaths. I once did archery, so could defend myself with a long bow, but it would be a bit hard to run the city streets equipped like Nerida from Brave. Watch the pointy ends, comrades in Burger. I'm sure that karma will ensure the cyclist who shot the homeless man will get an arrow up his Lycra pants in return.

JG. Save our footpaths

Respond to this comment

w from brisbane mutters...

Posted Sunday

I think cycling is fine and we should all just mellow out and share.
However, to amuse myself, when a cyclist is having a rant about drivers, I throw in my little question. Their almost inevitable response makes me smile about the perculiar absurdities of my species.

Cyclist: Fkn drivers! They reckon that we are too slow and have no right to be on the road. Bastards! Then they yell abuse and drive past with no care and give me a bloody fright.

Me: But what about pedestrians on paths?

Cyclist: Fkn pedestrians! They are too slow and should just get off the path. Bastards! I tell ‘em to fuck off. Or I just speed up and ring my bell right in their ear. That makes 'em jump! Ha!

Lulu ducks in to say...

Posted Monday

So so so true.

Respond to this thread

tqft swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Sunday

I saw that one and wondered what was going on.

Why are people assholes? No idea.

Respond to this comment

Barnesm ducks in to say...

Posted Sunday

I saw it.

Respond to this comment

Lulu mutters...

Posted Monday

Humourless comments on an article which mentions cyclists? How shocking & surprising.

Respond to this comment

dr reckons...

Posted 20 hours ago

dude wtf? are you serious... i almost die everyday... ? i dont hate on all drivers, but sometimes when i have just watched my girlfriend cut off by a taxi so she had to slam into the pavement just as a bus was pulling up, or actually grazed by a car half in the bike lane, i will hit their cars, kick them hard, hopefully leave a non fatal dent for future reference... its about lives not convenience... spose youll find no humour here, what was that article about giving females shit really for... so its ok for people to be worried your comments are hatefilled towards cyclists in general, but not ok for the same to apply to feministic issues, fuck off, you had me this morning with that article about men being dicks, but just lost me for life...

John Birmingham puts forth...

Posted 18 hours ago

Er, no. I'm not serious.

Respond to this thread

Respond to 'Wrote a Blunty and then forgot it'

I dips me lid to the prof

Posted Sunday into Books by John Birmingham

My thanks to Professor Bryan Gaensler for delivering up this weekend's freebie read, an edited chapter from his awesome book of thinky science things about the universe. Yes. The whole fucking universe. Today's extract is a roaring piece about the loudest sound never heard, and Extreme Cosmos is chockers with stuff like this that kids and teen geeks in particular would love.

It's probably also worth bookmarking for Father's Day

1 Responses to ‘I dips me lid to the prof’

Big Willie Style swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Sunday

Meh. I don't care how many letters Bryan Gaensler has got after his name. I get all my sciencamatific knowledge from Alan Jones. Everyone knows the universe is not 13.8 billlion years old, and there was no Big Bang. It's all just leftist lefty leftard lefty hogwash, designed to cover up the fact that we'll soon be ruled by One World Order, and all of our income will go directly to single mothers and drug addicts.

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'I dips me lid to the prof'

Book Extract - Extreme Cosmos by Prof. Bryan Gaensler

Posted Sunday into Book Extract by John Birmingham

The First Sounds in the Universe.

Gaaarn, you know you want to buy it.

There are supposedly no sounds in space, because space is a vacuum. After all, sound is a pressure wave that needs air in which to travel, so space must be completely quiet.

But as it turns out, there are sounds in space. Space might be more rarefied than anything we can produce in a laboratory here on Earth, but it is certainly not empty. In a typical part of the Milky Way, far from any stars, planets or nebulae, every cubic metre of space contains about a million atoms. This is more than 10 million trillion times fewer atoms than in a cubic metre of air at sea level, but it is still not a vacuum. Correspondingly, the pressure of the gas in space is extremely low. But because the pressure is not zero, the movements of stars, planets and other celestial bodies through the cosmos will produce upwards or downwards variations in this pressure. And these pressure fluctuations will then travel through space as sound waves.
As a result, the Universe is full of noise: the deep roaring of giant black holes, the sharp cracks of supernova explosions, and a myriad of other sounds. One way or another, all these sounds are produced by the actions of stars, black holes and galaxies. But these constituents of the cosmos have not always existed. We know that the Universe is 13.8 billion years old, and we know that there were times, very early on, when no stars or galaxies had yet formed.

So before the first star and before the first galaxy, were the vast stretches of the Universe filled with nothing but silence? Or was there a cosmic song long before there were individual singers? What was the first sound in the Universe?

These questions sound like the sort of thing best left to philosophers. But incredibly, astronomers can answer them with considerable precision.

There is very strong evidence that space and time both began with an event known as the “Big Bang”, which from our current best estimates occurred 13.8 billion years ago. But despite its name, the Big Bang is thought to have been utterly silent. The distributions of matter and energy created in this sudden cataclysmic event were almost perfectly smooth – there were no oscillations in pressure that could correspond to any noise.

However, after much less than a trillion trillionth of a second, when the observable Universe had expanded to about the size of a beach ball, the cosmos had become decidedly lumpy. As time passed, and the Universe continued to expand, the denser clumps of material used their gravitational attraction to pull in more mass toward them. These clumps then grew in pressure as the gas in them became more tightly squeezed, forcing the gas to expand. As these clouds of gas expanded, their pressure dropped and their expansion slowed. Gravity then began to exert itself, and the process repeated.

By less than a millisecond after the Big Bang, gas clouds over a whole range of sizes had begun collapsing and expanding, their pressure rising and falling as a consequence. Oscillations of pressure had been established – the Universe had found its voice!

These first sound waves were special. Rather than travelling from point A to point B, like my voice sending sound through the air to your ears, these waves oscillated up and down in pressure without actually going anywhere. These are known as “standing waves”, and are very similar to the stationary sound waves set up inside a flute or organ pipe.

The length of an organ pipe determines the tone of the sound it produces: the smallest organ pipes produce the highest notes. In an analogous way, the age of the observable Universe at these early times dictated the pitch of the primordial tune. When the Universe was very young, only clumps of matter that were relatively small, and for which the gas was able to expand and contract rapidly, had had enough time to complete one full cycle of pressure oscillations. Correspondingly, the cosmic choir was comprised only of sopranos. As the Universe aged, increasingly slower oscillations were completed, and correspondingly deeper notes were added to the chorus.

Furthermore, as time went on, the music became louder. This is because the overall level of clumpiness in the Universe increased as gravity began to exert its grip. As the clumps grew in size, the contrast between expansion and contraction of gas clouds was higher, and the pressure waves became stronger.

So what did the standing waves in the early Universe sound like? Just 10 years after the Big Bang, the dominant note in the Universe was F-sharp (but 35 octaves lower than the lowest note a human ear can perceive), at a volume of 90 decibels (about as loud as standing next to a lawnmower). Over the next hundred thousand years, a whole new set of larger gas clouds were able to begin oscillating: more than 13 octaves of even deeper notes were added to the celestial pipe organ, with the volume increasing by a factor of 20.

At any moment in time, just as the largest possible gas cloud was completing its first cycle of collapse and expansion, there were other gas clouds, exactly half the size, which had completed two full cycles, and yet more clouds, half again as large, which had oscillated four times. As a consequence, the loudest note was accompanied by a whole set of fainter harmonics and overtones.

However, do not envisage some pleasant sounding barbershop quartet. This set of harmonics was not the pure timbre of a musical instrument, but a blurry blend of overlapping notes. The result, if you could hear it, would be a fuzzy hiss, steadily descending in pitch and gaining in volume as the Universe aged.

This celestial song lasted for 380,000 years, but then abruptly ceased, never to resume. What happened to mute this enormous cosmological pipe organ? And how do we know that these sounds ever happened, if they vanished billions of years ago?

At very early times the Universe was a dense fog, because a ray of light was unable to travel even a short distance before colliding with a sub-atomic particle. It was throughout this period, known as the “pre-recombination era”, that clumps of gas expanded and collapsed, producing these first sounds.

However, after 380,000 years, the Universe had cooled to a temperature of 2700 oC, cold enough that sub-atomic particles could combine to form atoms. With this soup of free-floating particles removed, the skies cleared, and the cosmos became transparent.

This process silenced the Universe, because it changed the speed of sound. Before recombination, sound waves travelled through a gelatinous mix of light and matter, for which the speed of sound was about 60% of the speed of light, or about 620 million kilometres per hour. At this high sound speed, gas clouds were able to collapse and expand relatively quickly.

However, once matter and light went their separate ways, the speed of sound plummeted essentially to zero. At the moment of recombination all the sloshing of gas in and out immediately ceased, and the Universe became silent.

The cosmic symphony suddenly halted, right at the time when the Universe opened itself up for view. So how do we even know that these sounds existed?

We know because although these sounds have long since faded, the final crescendo is forever frozen into the very fabric of the cosmos.

The moment of recombination left behind the cosmic microwave background (CMB), a faint, cold light that fills the Universe. The CMB was discovered in the 1960s, and immediately became the object of detailed study by astronomers around the world. By the 1990s, precision observations were able to show that the glow from the CMB was not completely uniform, but that some parts of the sky were 0.001% warmer or cooler than others.

As measurements have continued to improve, these tiny variations have revealed a spectacularly detailed portrait of the Universe at that moment of recombination more than 13 billion years ago, just 380,000 years after the Big Bang. Because what these small temperature variations correspond to are individual clumps of gas, frozen in time in the middle of their pressure oscillations in or out. Those oscillations have now ceased their motion, but we can see them at their final positions. It is as if we have a photograph of the orchestra as it hits its final note: the conductor’s arms are raised high, and the performers can all be seen straining with effort as they play their instruments at their loudest volumes. But the sound itself is missing.

Astronomers have analysed these temperature fluctuations in considerable detail, and have found that the CMB is not comprised of a random jumble of different-sized sized patches of hot and cold, but that regions of higher or lower temperature tend to have certain sizes. In particular, most of the temperature variations that we can see extend over extents on the sky about twice the diameter of the full moon. This implies that there is a clear fundamental tone imprinted onto the Universe (subsequent analysis has that this is accompanied by at least five higher harmonics).

We can thus state with considerable accuracy and confidence that the dominant note of the cosmos at recombination was almost exactly 54 octaves below middle C, at an ear-splitting volume of around 120 decibels. To play this note, an organ would need a pipe more than 10 trillion kilometres long!

After recombination, the Universe continued to expand and cool, but did so in absolute silence. Over the next hundreds of millions of years, clumps of gas that happened to be near maximum contraction at recombination were able to continue collapsing under the influence of gravity, and eventually coalesced into the first stars and galaxies.

There is a startling connection between the strange harmonising of the pre-recombination era and the hubbub that the cosmos experiences today.

As we can see directly from the CMB, the hottest gas clumps at recombination (i.e., those that were just completing the compression part of their pressure oscillation at the moment the Universe became transparent) all had a particular size. The size that we see on the sky, about double the size of the full moon, corresponded to a physical extent of 460,000 light years at the time of recombination. However, over the more than 13.8 billion years since then, the Universe has expanded by more than a factor of 1000. As a consequence, if these regions still existed now, they would have been stretched so that they would now be 500 million light years across.

In the early 1980s, astronomers began to measure the three-dimensional positions of hundreds of relatively nearby galaxies, and found that they are not scattered uniformly, but are clumped into complicated patterns. The realisation that the Universe is not totally chaotic but has a characteristic structure was a remarkable discovery.

But in 2005, when astronomers had expanded their catalogues of galaxy positions to many tens of thousands of objects, an even more incredible result emerged. Not only is the distribution of galaxies clumpy, but the size of these clumps is not random. How big is a typical clump of galaxies? Pretty close to 500 million light years, the same size the hot clouds of gas from recombination would be if they had survived through to the present.

The conclusion is inescapable: these hot clouds have survived, but have now evolved into galaxies, stars, planets and people. What we see all around us, and indeed ourselves are part of, is a fossil record of the oscillating sound waves from the earliest times in history, forever woven into the distribution of matter throughout the cosmos.

The first sounds in the Universe ceased long ago. The conductor and the musicians have departed the cosmic stage, taking their instruments with them. However, the performers have left behind their sheet music. By studying the cosmic microwave background and the large-scale structure of the Universe, we can recover the first music ever played, music that was never intended to be heard.

Bryan Gaensler (@SciBry) is Director of the Centre for All-sky Astrophysics at The University of Sydney. This is an edited excerpt from his book Extreme Cosmos, published by NewSouth Books (Australia/NZ) and Penguin (everywhere else).

1 Responses to ‘Book Extract - Extreme Cosmos by Prof. Bryan Gaensler’

Barnesm asserts...

Posted Sunday

Love this stuff, and its available in the kindle

if interested in this sort of science stuff check out Downloaded the Universe reviews these sort of electronic books.

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Book Extract - Extreme Cosmos by Prof. Bryan Gaensler'

THIS IS SPARTA!!! Er, I mean this is a sequel

Posted Friday into Movies by John Birmingham

11 Responses to ‘THIS IS SPARTA!!! Er, I mean this is a sequel’

MickH would have you know...

Posted Friday

Wow!

I just watched 300 for the first time last weekend (Yes! took me a long time but I got there) and I loved it!

I hope they can continue the awesome saga without the King is all.

Respond to this comment

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan reckons...

Posted Saturday

Greek history is known to people who identify as Greek by ancestry, but for all of my life only historians and wargamers knew it, too. It amazes me that average punters know who Leonidas was and what he did at Thermopylae, and that they soon will learn who Themistocles was and what he did at Salamas.

I can't wait to actually see Athenian triremes smashing Persian ships.

Respond to this comment

Theopompus mutters...

Posted Saturday

Cersei Lannister vs Vesper Lynd

Respond to this comment

Barnesm would have you know...

Posted Saturday

This is AWESOME.

also on a techie matter, while tryign to view this on explorer at work the formating goes weird and I can not open the comments by clicking on "x responses to..." but if I click on the recent comments then I can see the comments but still can't post. Works fine in fireox and Chrome.

Respond to this comment

sibeen mumbles...

Posted Sunday

Bounces up and down with excitment

If this is better than the first one I may be able to endure more than the 15 minutes I actually lasted with 300.

Bounces up and down with excitment

Rhino puts forth...

Posted Sunday

Seven? Amateur.

Barnesm mutters...

Posted Sunday

Have you seen Se7en Three hundred times?

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan is gonna tell you...

Posted Monday

No. But I have seen the Seven Samurai and Seven Brides for Seven Brothers a number of times and have written a brilliant cross over screenplay for a musical entitled Seven Brides for Seven Samurai that always seems on the edge of a sale, but never quite.

Respond to this thread

Paul_Nicholas_Boylan swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Sunday

Seven times in Imax.

Respond to this comment

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'THIS IS SPARTA!!! Er, I mean this is a sequel'

Ep2 - Recapitated Podcast RSSiTunes

Posted Friday into Spartacast by John Birmingham

Podcast 2 is out. And this time I turned on the mic! Huzzah!

We have a special guest podgrrl this week, Ms Girl Clumsy who dropped in to talk about the art and science of recapping Game of Thrones before giving way to Mr Wah who had a few things to get off his chest about Star Trek: Into Darkness.

This week's show was sponsored by the one pot breakfast at Bungaow 4171 and as always, or at least until they find out, the Hilltop Hoods opened and closed the gig with some of their best, which you can totally buy here.

15 Responses to ‘Ep2 - Recapitated’

w from brisbane asserts...

Posted Friday

That sheila was good.

Brother PorkChop is gonna tell you...

Posted Friday

If you must use sheila, the better word for good is grouse.

Respond to this thread

Blarkon ducks in to say...

Posted Friday

Need to fix the IE 10 thing. Means I can't pause during the playback and this caused an issue when there was a child related event during the listen back. IE 10 has been pushed out to Windows 7 and it's the default on Windows 8 and Windows RT.

DNABeast would have you know...

Posted Friday

Shoot! I thought I'd fixed that. Bloody javascript!

DNABeast ducks in to say...

Posted Saturday

Okay, Here's what was happening. It would load the flash player and autostart. Then it would check to see if the browser could deal with html5 mp3 audio. If it could it would remove the flash player and autostart the html5 player. Now you've got 2 players running and only one presents any controls. Bit of a frustration but it should all work okay now.

Respond to this thread

Dino not to be confused with asserts...

Posted Friday

Just a thought but Kym Wilde could do Doctor who.

GC is too sexy. OMFG.

Respond to this comment

Blarkon swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted Friday

FFS what kind of anti-nerd drugs were you guys on?

It was the Botany Bay not the Endeavour. They got on it because they were running away after getting their arse kicked, not because they were off on a voyage on discovery.

Khan didn't kill David. FKN Kruge (Christopher Doc Brown Lloyd) killed him in the NEXT FILM! That's the whole fucking point of Star Trek 6. The KLINGONS KILLED MY SON.

Eugenics Wars were in the 90's. Khan was meant to be from the sub-continent (yet was played with a Latino actor - so if someone from india/pakistan can be played by a latino actor, why not have him played by Benedict)

John Birmingham reckons...

Posted Friday

Pfft. Picky picky picky.

Blarkon ducks in to say...

Posted Friday

You're Kirk and don't have to be up on the details. Your Spock and Scotty though ...

Barnesm mumbles...

Posted Saturday

Blarkon is of course correct on these things

Respond to this thread

Legless puts forth...

Posted Friday

"sponsored by the one pot breakfast at Bungaow 4171"

By sponsored, do you mean they paid you hard cash or is it free brekkies for life? Enquiring minds and all that

Cheers

John Birmingham asserts...

Posted Friday

Neither, actually. I'm just getting people used to the idea of sponsorship.

Respond to this thread

Barnesm reckons...

Posted Saturday

Best one yet, during the podcast I think its Dan or Greg who says to Girl Clumsy "your recaps are quite different' and he is correct GC's are different, they are loaded with much more awesome.

Respond to this comment

she_jedi mumbles...

Posted Saturday

I was one of those readers finishing a GoT episode then racing to Fairfax to read GC's recaps and howling in desolated angst when they were late. Glad it was not just me. GC and her recaps should be awarded National Treasure status. They made the separation anxiety from Westeros bearable as Tuesday loomed.

Looking forward to both Agents of Shield and your recaps though JB. You've got a high standard to reach after GC's efforts :)

Respond to this comment

Rhino would have you know...

Posted Sunday

Damn, The Rhino is lovin' these podcasts. GC sounded awesome. The testosterone in the room are not too shabby either.

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Ep2 - Recapitated'