Cheeseburger Gothic

Alexa in the house

Posted February 12 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

It's hard to believe I got an Echo before an Apple Homepod, but I did. The Echo is now sitting in our kitchen, where I would never dare put a Homepod. I've had a Bose bluetooth speaker in the kitchen for a couple of years now and it's given sterling service. But it's getting old, the charging brick has fallen apart, (I shudder to think how much it would cost to replace that sucker) and the whole unit looks like shit. Over the years it's picked up a second skin of cooking grease, microscopic organic debris, oily particulates and crap.

There is no way I want to drop $500 on a piece of Sir Jony Ive's handiwork in that environment.

The Echo, however... meh.

It's a fraction of the price, a literal fraction, about 1/5 I think, and it's not going to look any better once it's been exposed to a couple of weeks worth of cooking, but it's not going to break my heart either. Also, to be honest, the Echo is likely to be a lot more useful in the kitchen. The Homepod's inability to settle multiple timers has already been noted by most reviewers, as has Siri's constrained functionality compared to Alexa (and Google's eponymous AI). I think that misreads the purpose of Homepod, which is a mid-range premium speaker first, and a smart speaker a distant second.

Still, it creates an opening for Alexa. I've had her parked on the kitchen bench for a few days now and I'm getting used to the syntax and constraints native to Amazon's lady in a can. Because Alexa's APIs were opened up to developers immediately, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of 'skills' she can learn that are completely beyond Siri and probably Google.

I've taken to asking her for the surf report from Bondi every day.

Not having listened to the radio anywhere but the car for nearly a decade, I found myself listening to news bulletins again to start the day, because it's such a simple matter to ask Alexa to bring you up to speed. There are cocktail recipes, bus and ferry timetable information, cooking suggestions, podcast players, dictionaries, weather reports, all sorts of useful shit. It's a device focused on very broad but low-level functionality. That makes it a perfect fit for the kitchen. Or maybe just a very good fit. I don't find Alexa to be any more intelligent or responsive than Siri. There were some hilarious misfires when asking her to play music from an Internet radio service. (It's better now I've picked up an Amazon Music subscription on a free trial for three months).

I suspect the functionality will also greatly improve when Amazon Prime launches locally, and the Beast of Bezos starts competing with Coles and Woolworths for the food delivery market. The ability to add an item like butter or baked beans to a shopping list and have it turn up a day or so later will be a compelling use case. It's pretty much why I got the device.

It's a lot cheaper than Homepod, of course, and it sounds it. There are some types of music which sound authentically awful coming out of this speaker. OTOH there are plenty of other types, usually older albums for some reason, which sound just fine. Maybe it's the way music is produced these days, I don't know. But my old man music does sound way better than my new music playlists on this device.

It's hardly a dealbreaker, though. This is a kitchen speaker, and kitchens are terrible places to intensively listen to music. There's always something else going on, usually something noisy. Everything echoes of the hard surfaces. And people tend to be talking at or over each other. In that sort of environment a speaker which can pump out tracks at a reasonable volume is good enough, and this bad girl is more than good enough.

10 Responses to ‘Alexa in the house’

Therbs puts forth...

Posted February 12
So basically Alexa is your default breakfast radio crew without the zany hijinks. Be careful of the secret sound.

John Birmingham is gonna tell you...

Posted February 12
Hard to capture the depth of my loathing for zany fucking hijinks.

Bondiboy66 is gonna tell you...

Posted February 13
The surf has been crap at Bondi for weeks.

As for radio - the car stereo is stuck on 2MMM (and the attendant shouty tradie ads interspersed with Zaniness and popular 'rock' music....or JJJ if thats too much. Or CDs. Don't bother with radio at home for the above reasons.

Dunno if I want one of these things spying on me at home. My luddite inner self is a bit suspicious....

NBlob puts forth...

Posted February 16
I now podcast 6-7 hours a day. My Utes antenna was snapped off 2 years ago. Haven't bothered to replace it.

Respond to this thread

Dirk is gonna tell you...

Posted February 12
Looks good JB.

The problem I have with it is that it doesn't understand Dutch at the moment. But neither does El Goog at the moment (and Fruit IMHO is better bought at a green grocers ... ). But that is bound to change in time. Dutch will be in Home this year probably, and if Bezos comes over here (and he is making overtures to do so) Echo will support it also.

Would I buy one?
For a stand alone music system, maybe. But I would want to use more of the features and have it plugged in a total domotic infrastructure. So, music, video, lights, curtains, heat etc. And that "landscape" is at the moment to fragmented. To many different protocols, standards, interfaces. And with another battle of the brands brewing like in the 80-s with VHS, Betamax and V2000, i think i'm on the sideline for the moment.

But you made me curious what's out there.
I did some digging, and found something that might could be a reference for the 3rd generation. It's called Homey.
(note: site is best viewed in chrome, FF doesn't do the features that good).

IMHO it's not totally matured yet, but it could be the direction in which this battle will go.

The pro's:
1. what i can see it talks to about everything even old protocols like your tv via IR, bluetooth, different light systems, heating and WIFI/DNLA stuff.
2. It can operate with Alexa and Home.
3. It's an open system like Alexa, so there is room for growth

The con's
1. It's price is still a little on the hefty side (EUR 300, $ 370, A$ 470) but if that goes down to let say Eur 150-200, well then maybe.
2. The user friendly ness has to go up; what I've been reading in reviews installing it has kinda sorta steep learning curve at the moment, so that needs maturing.
3. What I can see it doesn't work in an Apple universe, except for the app. So no Apple TV interfacing etc. Not a big problem for me, but could be a downer for some.

PS: Google is teaming up over here with the largest grocer, so when Home finaly learns Dutch the shopping list could be made digitally. There is an app already for scanning the barcodes on products you want with your phone, so that won't be a biggie. add a cam to a next gen alexa/home maybe would be another option.

jl would have you know...

Posted February 12
Albert Heijn strikes again? The last time I was in Holland I was shocked by the little personal barcode scanners at the door of my mother-in-law's little village grocery, the Plus. You would scan your own groceries as you put them in the basket. It made shopping soooo easy- a much different experience than here in the US at Wal-Mart, where there are huge bottlenecks at checkout. And Alexa makes it easier yet.

Dirk mutters...

Posted February 12
Yep. They even took it a step further in the last 6 months...

For the uninciated: Albert Heijn is the biggest dutch grocer (think TESCO/Wallmart). Sister companies include among others ETOS (eq. Boots/Walgreens), Gall & Gall (off license/spirits) and (eq. Amazon).

Shopping and paying:
1. You can pay at a normal nice girl operated till (cash/direct debit)

2. You can use a handscanner, a dedicated phone app or if you have only few items a fixed scanner at the automated till, check in with your loyalty card and pay by direct debit. You can also drop your empty bottle receipt there, which is subtracted from your bill.

3. You can order online, and pick up your groceriers packed and all 2-6 hours later or have them home delivered within 24 hours (exc sundays for now) for a fee. They are working on a system to cut that back to 6 hours, and add your deliveries aswell.

The app also points you to the discounts of the week, can be used as a personal groceries list (just scan the barcodes, or use you loyalty card info: they know what you bought earlier), and gives you special bonus on products you buy regularly. So in my case for ex microwave meals, milk and coffee beans.

If that ain't fast enough, they are experimenting with Near Field Communication, so anything you dump into the trolley is automatically added to your bill. Swipe your loyalty card and Direct debit card (also NFC) at the exit and you can go on your merry way. is one of the reasons Amazon is not here yet. Starting out as a online bookretailer they added and added products (electronics, pet supplies, beautyproducts etc.) and also cater to other retailers, who for a fee can sell via the system and use the logistics track. Standard delivery is within 24 hours (which is de facto standard over here for about everything you shop for only unless its from Germany (Zalando/Correct + 1 day) or China (allibaba 4 day minimum), express delivery is for an extra fee within 6 hours.

Respond to this thread

Spanner reckons...

Posted February 13
I'd already tweeted this but it warrants repeating.

Mr17 got a goog home mini in his bedroom.

I told him that Google now listens to him masturbate.

The look of horror on his face was priceless. It works because there is a grain of truth in there. Just what is the sneaky bastard listening to?

Respond to this comment

Dave W reckons...

Posted February 14
It looks like there is a pod-coffee machine off to one side. I trust that this is to keep the junior Birminghams away from the aeropress and single origin civet-cat bespoke beans.

But anyway- we have the el goog at home and much fun and hilarity ensued when we ask it to put ham and bay leaves on the shopping list. Instead, cam and Bailey's wound up on the list. Glad there isn't a one-touch buying yet.

Respond to this comment

insomniac swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted April 12
Have you asked Alexa to open the pod bay doors?

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Alexa in the house'

Science is horrifying

Posted November 23, 2016 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

I'm not sure how I'll use the terriftying details of this New Scientist story about the "dinosaur-killing asteroid that turned planet Earth inside-out", but I suspect they'll turn up somewhere in The Cruel Stars.

How could they not?

By analysing the depths and compositions of the rocks, the team reconstructed a timeline for the impact.

First the asteroid blasted through almost all of Earth’s crust, propelling rocks from the bottom of the crust and lifting them 25 kilometres within 10 minutes. At the rim of the newly forming crater, a mountain range higher than the Himalayas lifted and collapsed within three minutes, leaving a halo of basement rock in a geological feature called a peak ring. At the centre, a massive peak of rock splashed upward, fluid-like, before collapsing again – much like the splash of a sugar cube in a cup of hot tea.

About 10 minutes after that, the rocks stabilised and stopped flowing like a liquid. The titanic forces of impact sent shockwaves through the planet and caused earthquakes that would top the 10-point Richter scale, rattling the ground with greater force than any existing fault is capable of producing.

13 Responses to ‘Science is horrifying’

jl puts forth...

Posted November 23, 2016
Harrowing reading. Imagine aliens or future humans doing it with deliberation while parked in orbit.

Nocturnalist mutters...

Posted November 23, 2016
Check out "The Forge of God" by Greg Bear, which concludes with exactly that. There are some pretty harrowing scenes from the PoV of some of the people caught in the middle of it.

(The book as a whole is less catastrophically actiony, but the long slow buildup is worth reading in full because it makes the ending that much more effective.)

insomniac mumbles...

Posted November 23, 2016
Sounds like something Havock or his descendants would be up for

HAVOCK21 has opinions thus...

Posted November 24, 2016

HAVOCK21 reckons...

Posted November 24, 2016
You know that anything worth doing is best done FROM FKN ORBIT!!

Respond to this thread

pitpat swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted November 23, 2016
Hey John,
Thanks for the link. As a bit of a rock doctor on the other side of the world I'm looking at rocks of similar age which have textural features that are similar but are related to explosive events derived from magmatic or batholithic sources. I would expect some vigorous discussion in the next couple of years. They might even get some more funding to drill another hole ( the hole they drilled probably cost between 1 and 10 mill) but more than likely they won't.

Either way it is a nice story in these times of post-modern science. As for big geology events it probably isn't in the top ten. If you drive from Brisbane through to the Whitsundays you are driving - in large part- across volcanic terranes- extruded during the late Jurassic/early Cretaceous that have volumes measured in millions of cubic kilometres. Probably not a great place for a beach house.

Any hoo Thanks for all your published work so far this year, have bought it all and loved it all even if I disagreed with some of it.

Respond to this comment

Spanner has opinions thus...

Posted November 23, 2016
Was there an earth shattering kaboom?

(Marvin the Martian reference)

Therbs mutters...

Posted November 25, 2016
Oh goodie! My Illidium Q36 explosive space modulator

Respond to this thread

MordWa is gonna tell you...

Posted November 23, 2016
*puts on Sid James leery voice*

"-That's still less 'ard than I'd hit Barbara Windsor give a tuppence chance. Amiright? Hehehurh"

Respond to this comment

John Petherick swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted November 24, 2016
Sounds like home!

I live in Sudbury, Ontario. My house is just south of the southern rim of the Sudbury Basin and I work up on the northwest edge of the rim, so I drive across the basin twice a day. The basin, however, has been deformed by tectonic forces so it is now an elliptical / ovoid shape rather than circular, further complicated by a second, smaller impact crater.

Sudbury breccia has different colours but looks very similar to the core in the article. Mind you, the drill only went down 1335 metres, barely scratching the surface (mind you, it was underwater, too).

Therbs ducks in to say...

Posted November 24, 2016
Sudbury! Stopped in there whilst on a ratsacking adventure through North America a few lifetimes ago.
Was heading west to east and had stopped at Sault St Marie then Sudbury before hitting Toronto.
Liked it. Had a fun pub, Peddlars? Was good.

Respond to this thread

NBlob puts forth...

Posted November 24, 2016
That neatly describes Greybeard getting into a bath

Gutz swirls their brandy and claims...

Posted November 26, 2016
That made the ginger beer i was drinking shoot out my nose!

Respond to this thread

Respond to 'Science is horrifying'

Kim Beazley on the new subs

Posted May 7, 2016 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

The Bomber returned from the embassy in Washington and took up a role with ASPI where he writes the occasional piece, bringing a lot more insider knowledge than most analysts:

While I was Ambassador to the US, I visited Electric Boat’s yard in Groton, Connecticut, where the US Navy’s latest Virginia class nuclear submarines are under construction. This wasn’t an indulgence. Part of my job was to seek constant reassurance from the relevant officials of our ally that strong US support would be forthcoming when we finally decided on a process and partner(s) for the replacement for the Collins-class submarines. That reassurance was constantly but, lately, impatiently given. They came to wonder when we would get on with it. The US regards the Australian submarine as a potent addition to allied underwater strength in the Pacific.

I was taken aboard the then-latest Virginia-class submarine, the USS Missouri. The captain showed us the control room and asked me if I recognised anything. I said ‘yes’ and told him that I appeared to be standing in a Collins-class submarine. He responded, ‘Exactly’. The US had benefitted greatly from the structures we had put in place in the Collins. He had served as an exchange officer on one of them. ‘Best submarine I have served on’. It was polite hyperbole, but the USN has great respect for the class nonetheless. It has been a handful in joint exercises—so troubling, in fact, that a couple of years ago they hired the Swedes to practice on, as they tried to get to grips with finding modern conventional submarines. On my bookshelf sits a photo of the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln taken on exercise through the periscope of a Collins. The submarine, undetected, had just put three “torpedos” into the carrier.

Read it all here.

13 Responses to ‘Kim Beazley on the new subs’

w from brisbane would have you know...

Posted May 7, 2016
I believe a reasonable working ratio for subs is about 4:1, which means that having 12 subs might give you 3 subs available at any one time.

Respond to this comment

ShaneAlpha mumbles...

Posted May 8, 2016
Are we starting a petition to name the first one the HMAS Havok?

HAVOCK21 ducks in to say...

Posted May 8, 2016
Its got a C in it FFSAKES MAN!

Nocturnalist asserts...

Posted May 9, 2016
Not if he's proposing to name it after the Marvel character.

Respond to this thread

Surtac has opinions thus...

Posted May 9, 2016
Confirming what I'd heard off the record for awhile now - the Collins class are f*cking good at their jobs.

Respond to this comment

another JB mumbles...

Posted May 9, 2016
Having presided over the last debacle it's no surprise Bomber has enthusiasm for the next one.

The success of Collins as more to do with the crew performing above and beyond in a platform badly compromised by a poor development process.

A poor process being replicated in alarming detail again now.

Seriously the wikipedia article is well work a background read.

Respond to this comment

Barnesm ducks in to say...

Posted May 9, 2016
I didn't realize that the French boat is designed as nuclear and the Australian model will be fitted for diesel, how can that possibly be a very efficient design?

Nocturnalist ducks in to say...

Posted May 9, 2016
You're absolutely right, Barnes. Should be coal.

Barnesm ducks in to say...

Posted May 9, 2016
because according to an ex-PM it's good for humanity?

Respond to this thread

Murphy_of_Missouri puts forth...

Posted May 9, 2016
Or you could do the novel thing of getting over a resistance to nuclear power.

Barnesm asserts...

Posted May 9, 2016
To be fair there are some advantages of diesel to nuclear other than ideological nut-baggery. I remember reading the heat signature from nuke subs is harder to conceal whereas if you turn the engines off on a diesel boat the acoustic signal is zero.

Murphy_of_Missouri has opinions thus...

Posted May 9, 2016
I am aware of that.

I was mainly referencing the concerns of trying to take a nuke and turn it into a diesel. I'm sure they'll work it out though.

Respond to this thread

Bondiboy66 would have you know...

Posted May 9, 2016
I have been told a similar story about Aussies v US on Ex when we still had the Orion Class subs - i.e. Aussie sub sneaks into US fleet, shadows a large aircraft carrier for about three days, takes pics and sound/sonar recordings, then slips away undetected. Make of that what you will!

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Kim Beazley on the new subs'

Raising the dead for profit

Posted May 6, 2016 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

Philadelphia-based biotech company Bioquark, Inc. has been granted approval from an Institutional Review Board at the National Institutes of Health to complete a clinical trial of a drug to wake the dead.

Seems legit. Can't imagine a downside to messing with powers beyond our control.

11 Responses to ‘Raising the dead for profit’

FormerlyKnownAsSimon reckons...

Posted May 6, 2016
Please let the first person this is successful on be a comedian whose first words are "Brainnnsss"

Quickly followed by "just kidding! just kidding! put down the chair. Jeez i feel like shit what happened to me?"

Respond to this comment

Dave W mumbles...

Posted May 6, 2016
The good news is that, if I've learnt anything from the zombie genre, there will be one scientist who worked on this but transferred over to Honolulu six months before the outbreak and because of her work with Bioquark we won't know whether she's a goodie or a baddie, but we suspect that she has developed a vaccine for the survivors.

Oh, and those survivors will have interminable journey from the region of the initial outbreak to Honolulu.

But at least in real life we'll know that it was those crazy people at Bioquark who started the whole mess.

Respond to this comment

GhostSwirv would have you know...

Posted May 6, 2016

Bioquark isn't a subsidiary of Cyberdyne Systems by any chance?

Respond to this comment

SG has opinions thus...

Posted May 6, 2016
Check out Ressurection Inc by K.J. Anderson

Respond to this comment

WA n'ker mumbles...

Posted May 6, 2016
Is it effective on cremated remains?
Uncle Malcolm would probably buy some.

Respond to this comment

Therbs reckons...

Posted May 6, 2016
Six drops of the essence of terror, five drops of sinister sauce ...

Barnesm mumbles...

Posted May 7, 2016
'whoops too much'

Respond to this thread

pi ducks in to say...

Posted May 6, 2016
We ALL know how this is going to end.

Respond to this comment

pi has opinions thus...

Posted May 6, 2016
Totally OT, but if you haven't read this investigative journalist piece on the man who wrote trucrypt... It really is amazing stuff. Truly breath-taking.

Respond to this comment

Rhino puts forth...

Posted May 7, 2016
OK, I'll go for the obvious: Hmmmm, I wonder if this would work on (insert name of living politician, living boring person, etc., here).

I was going to say something about Havok ... but then realized that they are probably using a serum derived from his adrenal gland for this stuff.

Respond to this comment

Barnesm would have you know...

Posted May 7, 2016
so new hangover cure.

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Raising the dead for profit'

Japan Times on sub deal

Posted May 2, 2016 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

A tip o' the propellor beanie to Guru Bob for this link to a pretty good Japan Times piece on how the Japanese lost the bid to build the RAN's submarines when they started off with the inside running.

In February 2015, Abbott called his “best friend in Asia,” as he had previously described Abe, to tell him about the new bidding process. Abe sympathized and said he would do his best to comply, two sources with knowledge of the conversation said.

Yet, convinced the deal was still in the bag, Japan’s bidding group dithered.

“Even though we were in the competition we acted as though nothing had changed,” said one Japanese government source involved in the bid. “We thought we had already won, so why do anything to rock the boat?”

The Japanese did not attend a conference for the Future Submarines project in March, failing to understand the importance of the crucial lobbying event and leaving the field to their German and French rivals, sources on the Japanese bidding team said.

Japan’s belated attempt to engage with potential local suppliers at a follow up event in August 2015 went badly.

Companies complained Tokyo was unwilling to discuss substantive deals. Having only ever sold arms to Japan’s military because of a decades-old ban on exports that Abe lifted in 2014, neither MHI nor KHI had any Australian military industrial partners.

And unlike France and Germany, which quickly committed to building the submarines in Australia, Japan initially only said it would follow the bidding rules, which required building in Australia as just one of three options.

“The Japanese had been invited in on a handshake deal and were left trying to compete in an international competition having no experience in doing such a thing,” an Australian defense industry source said.

By September 2015, Japan’s key ally Abbott had been deposed by Malcolm Turnbull, blowing the competition wide open.

Full report is here and worth a look.

7 Responses to ‘Japan Times on sub deal’

DiddyWrote ducks in to say...

Posted May 3, 2016
The question to ask, is why was it a handshake deal in the first place?

dweeze would have you know...

Posted May 3, 2016
...because Captain Tones was (is?) an idiot and the Japanese didn't see that clearly enough.

Respond to this thread

HAVOCK21 puts forth...

Posted May 3, 2016
Plenty og captains calls get made. its just the severity of the fk up or really whether or not it is a fk up, and also that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

I wonder if its better to HAVE a decision that NOT have a decision, given the decision has been waiting to be decided for some fkn time and the list of culprits is rather long and large.

As for the choice, well its a good one IMHO. Even if it does mean we get a frog boat.

But here is the kicker, that a rather large amount are NOT aware of:




All the other screaming about combat systems and the US not supplying etc is pure bullshit.

Im not keen on forward tube launched TLAMS or similar via the tubes, vert cells would have been much better.

Respond to this comment

NBlob would have you know...

Posted May 3, 2016
Still think we could have all the nice things for $50 BILLION.

HAVOCK21 mutters...

Posted May 3, 2016
yeah, but subs are sexy...and we could do a bit of whale research for ya!

Respond to this thread

GhostSwirv mutters...

Posted May 5, 2016
HAVOC21, When you say 'whale research' it sounds more like the whole exercise is really about spying on MAGMA displacement or sperm whales & humpbacks cavorting or even 'caterpillar drives' trying to nut out why Sean's accent is different to Sam's.

Respond to this comment

HAVOCK21 has opinions thus...

Posted May 5, 2016
I would be I aint got enough hair!

Respond to this comment

Respond to 'Japan Times on sub deal'

The Kindle Oasis. A strategic review

Posted April 19, 2016 into Science and Tech by John Birmingham

The new Kindle Oasis is a very slick looking piece of kit. It looks like it came from the future, even though we’ve been surrounded by e-readers and tablets for nearly a decade now. It’s also expensive. Really expensive compared to the entry-level Kindles which Amazon supports with advertising. How expensive is the new Kindle, which remains, remember, a single use device? It will cost you more than an iPad Mini 2.

Amazon is infamously secretive about sales figures, algorithms, everything. But I think I can detect a few moving shadows in the dark. For a couple of years now the Beast of Bezos has been downplaying the role and importance of free books. When Amazon first opened the floodgates of self publishing it put the frighteners on the old school publishing houses by flooding the market with hundreds of thousands of free and super cheap books by previously unpublished authors. It started the first self publishing gold rush, which Amazon being Amazon smashed flat couple of years later with a few tweaks to the algorithm.

Without getting into the weeds on the topic, free and even cheap is a lot less important these days. Partly that’s because the e-reader market has matured. The Kindle won. The iPad remains an powerful irritant. Kobo limps along behind them. (Although I do like their waterproof model). The early adapters who bought all of those clunky, early model Kindles also bought dozens, even hundreds of titles each to fill them up. Free and cheap were hugely important in building that market. Now, not so much. E-readers have become a commodity, a loss leader for Amazon. Jeff Bezos has said as much in an interview with the BBC.

As the technology matured, so did the demographic using it. An average Kindle user in 2016 is nothing like the free-seeking binge reader of 2010. They might buy half a dozen titles over the course of a year, making them less price sensitive than somebody downloading more than 100 books in the same period.

I think this latest Kindle, the Oasis, is meant for them.

For myself, however, it raises interesting questions about how much I can ask people to pay for books when I finally start releasing them retail, rather than giving them away. The books I release independently are never going to cost as much as the books I do with my trade publishers. But they’re not all going to be free or super cheap either. I have to be able to pay editors, artists, type setters and so on.

As I said the other day, I’m not just a writer now, I’m a publisher. And I find these questions fascinating.

21 Responses to ‘The Kindle Oasis. A strategic review’

Surtac puts forth...

Posted April 19, 2016

Yep. What I said on the Book of Farce already.

As a reader who has long been intrigued by the mysteries of publishing, I have always found such questions fascinating.

Respond to this comment

Therbs has opinions thus...

Posted April 19, 2016

Costs more than an iPad mini? Fuggedaboutit, I'd take the mini every time. The Fire works well enough for me for book reading. And I've found it doesn't crap itself if a few drops of beer are spilt on it.

As for pricing eBooks and based on a quick squiz at Amazon I reckon $10 - $13 range seems to be the range for decent scribbling. Sits about right with me.

Respond to this comment

moz is allegedly literate mutters...

Posted April 19, 2016
As it happens I've just bought the Kobo glowaterproof thing, and it's quite excellent. It replaces the previous Kobo, which was not quite drop-resistant enough to last more than 3 years. The previous one had the possible advantage that I could open it up and clone the micro-SD card inside onto a bigger one, revealing that the Kobo library software did not like (very strongly did not like) having 2000+ epub files on board. My current habit is to read and delete, rather than stockpiling books on the device.

Pricing... I dunno, I like the $5/book sort of level and I really like the N-book series for less than $5xN but mostly I really, really dislike two things. One, ebooks that are not available. Stross is particularly bad about this, regularly advertising specials and new releases that "may reach Australia eventually" but never at the advertised price (the one that sticks is two quid becoming $AUS12.99 six months later). Second, books that I can only rent. You seem better about this, but if there's one thing Amazon has taught me, it's that DRM and WiFi-only connectivity are not acceptable. I will load unprotected epubs onto my device via USB or uSD, or I will not buy the device, and if I can't buy unprotected epub, I can't buy.

According to Fictionwise I spent over $US1000 in the three years or so I was allowed to buy from them, at about $US6/book. That seemed fair enough to me. But I suspect it's biased by my subscriptions to Asimov's and F&SF pushing the price per item down (remember when they still sold magazine subscriptions rather than only single issues?).

Respond to this comment

Blarkon mumbles...

Posted April 19, 2016
Club Birmo. Nominal fee. "Free" ebooks and short stories whilst member of said club. People that are not members of Club Birmo instead pay retail for same ebooks several months after club members have access. Special newsletter. Signing up gets you a special members only book that is never released to the public. Books could be serialized to ensure a drip feed of material. Would require having some stuff in the stash to start with while you get rolling.

John Birmingham ducks in to say...

Posted April 20, 2016
I've thought about this, but I have to bring the readers to me, or the club. They're already browsing Amazon etc. It could be a plan for the medium term however, once I've settled down the new model.

Respond to this thread

JG would have you know...

Posted April 19, 2016
I hope the Kindle screens are brighter than they used to be. I was given my sister's old 2011 or 2012 Kindle and it's very dim. Might be a Kindle Touch (grey bezel). Will have to get a clip-on light. Think I could get used to ebooks,but on a nicer ereader.Hopefully, recent Kindles have a built-in backlight and a whiter backgroundwith greater contrast between text and page.
Anyway, my dim Kindle didn't stop me from devouring ten chapters of Cairo yesterday. Ripping, JB.

moz is allegedly literate reckons...

Posted April 19, 2016
Both my Kobo's go scary bright, and I generally run them at the lowest setting (1%) and wish they'd go lower. I also wish they had a set of red LEDs for reading at night, but mostly just that the brightness scale was properly logarithmic so I could make the thing dim enough. The latest one definitely has a "torch" mode...why anyone would want to point that at their eyes I don't know. But it's e-ink, you could always buy a head torch and read using that.

Respond to this thread

Marccarno puts forth...

Posted April 19, 2016
Apologies for the above Post from the Cairo thread, for some reason my tablet decided to paste a previous Post when I wanted to add to this thread :-(
Anyway, my quick 10p. I'm minded to say that single use devices were always a marketing tactic and I loved the Kindle when it first came out but..... I'd liken owning a Kindle Oasis to being a person who, in 1995, decided that buying a dedicated word processor was a better deal than buying a Pc. There comes a tipping point where a dedicated device is absolutely redundant in Comparison to a general purpose, multi-use device (ok, there will always be a specialist 1% but that's exactly who they are - and you don't build a mass-market business model on 1%).
As for the trends around eBook pricing, they are far more disturbing and remind me of the mistakes several of the music industry Giants made during the painful Tranformation of the music business model (an ongoing phenomena). So, the emergence of the £9.99 and £12.99 eBook is absolutely farcical - I have even seen eBooks priced higher than their paperback equivalent. Now, I will not be buying general fiction for £12.99 when I know I can get the pulp version for £7.99 - and I speak as someone who does buy approx 100 novels/year and happily pays for them.
So, the music industry got greedy and music is now massively 'free' with pretty much the industry holding on by its spotifying/iTunes-ing fingertips. Almost everyone I know who doesn't have an iDevice just downloads music for free and most of those folks look at me strangely at my "old fashioned" approach of busying everything through iTunes.
Even Amazon may find that if they collaborate with the publishing industry to reset prices higher than mass-public expectations then the so-called eBook paradigm can shift again just as quickly - they should ask Sony/EMI/et-al.

sibeen mutters...

Posted April 20, 2016
<h3 style="transition: all 0.1s ease; font-size: 18px; margin: -4px 0px 0px 40px; font-weight: 400; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">Marccarno, you shouldn't be apologising, rather you should be demanding a retraction of the new story; or at least a major fucking editing of the last few pages. It's the only right thing to do.</h3>

I think I'll start a petition, or a hunger strike, or something.

John Birmingham asserts...

Posted April 20, 2016
S'okay. I've moved it to the appropriate thread.

John Birmingham mutters...

Posted April 20, 2016
Re, pricing. I've been watching the prices points set by the major publishers for new works. They seem to average out at $12-13 for mass market release, going as high as $24 for the digital equivalent of a new trade paperback format. I just don't see it working. I have a rough rule of thumb for ebooks. One dollar for every ten thousand words, up to a ceiling of... well, I don't know yet. But nowhere near the $12-13. I'd have to offer some very special extras for that.

Slippy puts forth...

Posted April 22, 2016
Really? $1 for 10,000 words per download? That's hard graft.
I don't understand this at all, but I think the youtube heroes might offer some evidence about what is happening. They build a base of subscribers who like the antics etc. and then 'somehow' get paid. The part I don't understand is how they get paid and become wealthy.
As for market data, I have all the devices and still mostly read non-work stuff on my iphone 6 5.5. Just to reach into my backpack and pull out the kindle to start reading a novel seems too much effort. Laziness is the key.

John Birmingham reckons...

Posted April 24, 2016
Slippy, $1 for 10K words would be very hard graft if you were only selling those words once. But I sell them many times over.

Respond to this thread

Barnesm mumbles...

Posted April 20, 2016

DAMMIT. I finally replaced my first generation kindle, received as a Christmas present back in 2010 then last Christmas I was gifted a brand new Kindle Whitepaper a brilliant piece of reading tech. I think it was based on recommendations I read about it here.

Now there is a new kindle available. I look at the latest model in another six years.

The first e-book I downloaded was a few one. Mellvile's Moby Dick as germane to the discussion a lot of free texts were available for me from the out of copywrite classics which allowed me to have a lot of books I could read on my kindle.

Respond to this comment

Lulu is gonna tell you...

Posted April 20, 2016
I did a quick survey (i.e. furtive looking) at the people on my PT trip to work this morning, & there seem to be very few people with either iPads or e-readers. Most people were on their phones (calls, texts, FB, emails, games etc). I only noticed a couple with screens big enough to be iPad/tablet; they were actually outnumbered by people reading dead-tree books.

John Birmingham would have you know...

Posted April 20, 2016
That probably explains why my iBooks download stats are unusually high. People are reading on their phones. The numbers are skewed enough that I'm considering giving Apple an exclusivity window on later releases in return for some promo payback.

she_jedi puts forth...

Posted April 20, 2016
Yep, I read on the iPad at home, but now that I have an iPhone 6 the screen is big enough to warrant comfortably reading a book if I'm out and about. I felt like a right knob reading on the iPad in public when I first got it, and when I discovered that I could read on the iPhone 5 without causing an aneurysm I immediately switched to that for public reading.
As well as iBooks I have the Kindle app on the phone and iPad, but iBooks is my preferred reading app. I will upload DRM free books, or buy them through the store. These days I get Kindle books only if Amazon has a particularly attractive discount on a specific book that I'd have to pay full price for in iBooks.

Respond to this thread

Surtac reckons...

Posted April 20, 2016

Just did some data analysis on my Amazon kindle purchases over the last 6 months and thought you might find the data useful.

Out of 52 books, 33 were fiction and 19 non-fiction. Average (mean) price was $7.10, median price was $6.99. Only 14 books were $10 or above and 8 of those were non-fiction.

John Birmingham ducks in to say...

Posted April 20, 2016
Thanks Tac. That is useful.

Respond to this thread

Dirk is gonna tell you...

Posted April 20, 2016
Well JB, economics 1 oh 1 time then.
Let's break it up into biteabel chunks:

Cost: add the next items
x editing
x cover design
x type setting
x wear and tear on computers
x travel and research cost
x communication costs
x accountants and legal
x marketing (time on facebook, interviews, banners, site etc.)
x setup costs for next book (investment)

Profit margin:
so your wife and kids don't have to "find other sources of income"

Projected sales:
Divide that by a number of copies you intend to sell and subtract 20%. Take Rome for example as a benchmark.

$ 1000 editing
$ 500 cover design
$ 500 type setting
$ 700 wear and tear and 230V on computers
$ 1000 travel and research cost
$ 500 communication costs
$ 2000 accountants and legal
$ 500 marketing (time on facebook, interviews, banners, site etc.)
$ 1000 setup costs for next book (investment)

Sub total $ 7700 in this example (but you know your actual figures)

Profit margin: so your wife and kids don't have to "find other sources of income"

Let say you publish 3 books a year and want to make $ 50.000 before taxes. So every book has to generate $17.333

So your a book would cost $ 25.000 (7.700 + 17.333).

Let say you want sell 5.000 copies of each book (so the benchmark is 4.000 copies), sell them at $ 6,25 + VAT average and you will break-even.

Sell more and it adds $ 6.25 per book to your income/investment chest for other books. So do serialization/other languages (have that done by publishers though)/print/movie and TV rights. But those are extra's and are extra windfall.

Have a chat though with someone who knows the Aussi tax system. Here in Europe the cost you make for making stuff (including VAT) is tax deductible, and as an entrepreneur you get extra allowances etc.

Dirk is gonna tell you...

Posted April 20, 2016
NB: don't forget about this neither:

won't yield millions but hey, it will bring your gold plated hovercraft a little closer ...

Respond to this thread

Respond to 'The Kindle Oasis. A strategic review'